image description
The Parks Commission is considering how to make swimming safer for children at the city's public beaches.

Pittsfield Looking to Increase Safety at Public Beaches

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The city wants to create a plan that will yield the safest public waterfronts possible.

The Parks Commission on Tuesday discussed a request from resident Daniel Miraglia to require life jackets or floatation devices on all swimmers at city-owned public beaches. His petition was referred to the panel at last week's City Council meeting.

While personal floatation devices cannot be required by law for the general public, the intent is to present a proposal that creates the safest waterfront possible for public beaches that don't always have lifeguards on duty.

"We don't want to create a false sense of security," Park, Open Space, and National Resource Program Manager James McGrath cautioned.

In June, the Berkshire District Attorney's Office kicked off a "summer of water safety" initiative and the city announced that weekend lifeguards would return to Burbank Park on Onota Lake.  

Two years ago, an 8-year-old girl was found unresponsive at the public beach and later passed away.  In July, a Herberg Middle School student drowned at Benedict Pond in Great Barrington.

McGrath and Recreation and Special Events Coordinator Maddy Brown looked into existing state regulations. McGrath said Miraglia's concern seems to be swimmer safety and "that has been paramount to us as well."

They cited Christian's Law, which sets minimum requirements for personal flotation devices for minor children at municipal and recreational programs and camps.

"It does not apply to the beach at Burbank Park because the city is neither offering a camp nor a program," Brown explained.

"In regards to the drop-in camp that we did take out there for the playground program, we did a lot of the things that the Christian's Law promoted, the buddy checks and having personal flotation devices available to kids that maybe were struggling a little bit, we had lifeguards on duty, there were a lot of safety measures in place for that but as far as generally requiring everyone to wear a PFD wouldn't be something that is required at the beach at all times."



McGrath explained that when the city is directly responsible for swimmers at Burbank Park under a program, it consulted the YMCA aquatics division for its protocols and is implementing a "very strong and rigorous" way to make sure that water safety is promoted.

With kids outside of the park program, he acknowledged that there is a certain amount of parental oversight that needs to play into this.

"We rely on all kids at the beach to have a guardian or a parent, whether or not there are lifeguards there or not. At present, we don't have personal flotation devices available for children to borrow but this is something we are thinking of implementing," he said.

"Certainly when the lifeguards are on duty, we could make available a certain amount of PFDs in various sizes for kids and we could make a sign acknowledging that, like, hey, if you feel more comfortable having them swim with a personal flotation device, ask a lifeguard. We also are considering if we don't have lifeguards on duty and there's still a need for someone to use a PFD, maybe we can make a certain amount of them available in a small kiosk and we would hope that they would be borrowed and returned in good working order."

Commissioner Simon Muil pointed out that it could be a double-edged sword, because if a parent is not paying enough attention to their child in the water, they may pay even less attention if they are wearing a life vest.

"Part of that proposal should be something that we can enforce," he said.

Swim tests on children were also discussed as a possible component.

"We're not trying to reinvent the wheel and some of our best proposals are those that have been modeled on other communities so that will be part of what we'll look at," McGrath said. 

"But again, I think we're taking this seriously and this is not something that we would simply say 'We got to file this.' No, this is this important, what the petitioner raised. We want to respect it but at the same time understand that there may be some limitations. I don't think the petitioners complete ask that all children wear PFDs is the right way to go but there's somewhere in the middle, there's something we can get to and promote utmost of safety."


Tags: parks commission,   public parks,   swimming,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories