image description
ServiceNet operates two shelters in Pittsfield: a 40-bed facility on Pearl St. and a recently opened shelter for about 25 families.

Pittsfield Homeless Panel Mulls Pressures of State Sheltering Changes

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Statewide changes in shelter regulations have put further stress on the homeless population.

These include a nine-month stay limit for families waiting to find permanent housing and up to five days at a respite site across the state.

"There are currently about 7,500 family units of shelter across the state and there are probably another 700 people on a contact list awaiting a shelter placement," Erin Forbush, director of shelter and housing at ServiceNet, reported to the Homelessness Advisory Committee.

She advised the panel to think about local families eligible for Emergency Housing Assistance who are waiting and families who are not eligible.  EA is a state program that provides shelter and financial support to families with children or pregnant women experiencing homelessness. 

The approaching colder season also poses a threat.

"Many families I know in this community are in their cars," Forbush said. "It's that much harder to be in your car in the winter."

Director of Community Development Justine Dodds said that there aren't enough resources or housing to go around and it's becoming increasingly challenging, especially with the limitations on some of these programs.

Last year, the governor declared a state of emergency due to a boom in immigrant families arriving in Massachusetts in need of shelter and services and a "severe" lack of shelter availability.  The EA system was then determined to be at capacity with 7,500 families.

In July, the Healey-Driscoll administration announced changes to its EA prioritization and safety-net sites.

"These changes are intended to address the system's continuing capacity constraints, lower costs, and protect the financial sustainability of the EA system," according to a press release.

Beginning Aug. 1, families are prioritized for placement in EA shelters if they are homeless because of a no-fault eviction, because of sudden or unusual circumstances in the state beyond their control, or if they have at least one member who is a veteran.  Families will continue to be prioritized if they have significant medical needs, newborn children, are at risk of domestic violence, or are homeless because of fire, flood, or other disasters.

Those not prioritized for EA shelters can stay at a temporary respite center in Chelsea, Lexington, Cambridge, and Norfolk for up to five days.  If they choose that route, they must wait at least six months for placement in the state's emergency shelter system.

A nine-month stay requirement for EA shelters was signed into law in the spring.

ServiceNet operates two shelters in Pittsfield: a 40-bed facility on Pearl St. and a recently opened shelter for about 25 families.

Forbush reported that the average range for finding families housing is a year.  With a nine-month limit on sheltering, it is a tight deadline.



"The change really was that people could come into the system and they would stay in the system or in the shelter until we were able to find them permanent housing. Now because of the crisis in the homeless-specific family system, they have created a nine-month length of stay for families," she said.

"So families are able to be in the shelter but it's always been important that we house families as quickly as possible and it's unfortunate the timing of this because it's actually that much harder to house families today than it was a year two years ago."

Families can apply for a voucher to stay in the shelter for a couple of months longer.

"We're lucky to have a 40-bed shelter here in Pittsfield. We have not had that always," Forbush said. "But the need is greater than those 40."

The committee also discussed the upcoming winter with homelessness.

Dodds pointed out that ServiceNet's temporary emergency shelter at the former St. Joseph's High School had the capacity for expansion to accommodate more people but at the new Pearl St. location that may not be possible.

There are over 40 units of "extremely low-income" housing units in progress that will not be ready for the winter.

Dodds suggested looking at ways to be more flexible when it comes to temporary emergency needs for shelter.

"We're going to try our best to advocate for some flexibility in how we interpret things. We're going to try our best to advocate for funding and try our best all around to really help our most vulnerable community members be safe this winter," she said.

Forbush added that "we don't always think about families every winter and typically we don't because there is another system."

"And now we have to add on to that," she explained. "Even families that are eligible may not have a space to go."


 


Tags: homeless,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Fenton: Governor's Council Must Deliver for the Berkshires

Community submissionGuest Column
I am a Springfield lawyer running for Governor's Council and I am asking for Berkshire County residents to support me over an incumbent from North Adams. 
 
Here's why: Last year I learned about staffing issues in our regional courts that I could not ignore. In 2025, it was reported that four of Western Massachusetts' 11 Superior Court judgeships were vacant, all at the same time. A few weeks later, that grew to five vacancies. This meant there were only six Superior Court judges serving all of Western Mass at a time when Berkshire, Hampshire, Franklin, and Hampden counties had more than 100 pending homicide cases. 
 
Those numbers were alarming to me, so I started to engage with leaders in the community who work most closely with the court system and I came to learn that these vacancies were only the tip of the iceberg here in Berkshire County.
 
I learned that no Superior Court or District Court judge had been appointed from the Berkshires since the current incumbent took office. As a result, there is not a single Superior Court judge who lives in the Berkshires today, and several of the District Court judges drive in from other counties to support Berkshire courts in Pittsfield, Great Barrington, and North Adams. Court staff also informed me about severe staffing shortages at the Berkshire Clerk of Courts office resulting in other counties needing to loan staff to the Berkshires just so hardworking employees can take a brief and planned summer vacation. This is not normal. These issues are a reflection of genuine problems with the Berkshire County court system and show a lack of proactive attention from our Governor's Councilor.
 
Instead of focusing on regional equity, I watched as the current incumbent celebrated that she has voted against the governor's nominees more than any other councilor, without much explanation as to why. Most recently, she voted against two extremely qualified former prosecutors for the Parole Board. This was despite an in-person plea from the governor and a letter of support from all the three of the district attorney's from Western Mass. Those votes do not show independence or standing up for principles, they demonstrate naivete, and an unwillingness to work with the key stakeholders.
 
I had seen and heard enough. I decided to jump in the race and challenge the incumbent to address these problems head-on.
 
I am a partner of a regional law firm. I understand our courts and the importance of having qualified, fair and hardworking judges. And I know how important it is to have judges from the Berkshires serving the Berkshires. To achieve that, you need strong relationships with the legal community and local stakeholders. You need to know how to use the power of the Governor's Council to fight forcefully for our region. And you need to be laser focused on identifying vacancies before they occur so that they can be filled quickly with local candidates.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories