Pittsfield Housing Trust Has End of Year ARPA Deadline

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Affordable Housing Trust has four months to commit a half-million dollars in American Rescue Plan Act funds.

Community Development Director Justine Dodds delivered this "somewhat surprising" news to the panel last week. It was previously believed that they had a couple more years to decide which housing projects would receive support.

"As compressed as it may seem, I feel like we are really in kind of a good spot," Dodds said, explaining that the panel has letters of interest, an overview of interested applicants, and a full application that will allow them to make an informed decision.

What this means, she said, is that the board will have to review the applications in depth and commit to getting them done in September and October. Members voted for a Sept. 17 deadline understanding that some applications may require additional information.

The U.S. Department of Treasury has updated its guidance over the last couple of months, having a couple of effects on the trust's process. Some $500,000 was allocated from the city to the trust and there was somewhat of a memorandum of understanding between the two entities that was believed to comply with the 2026 deadline, Dodds said.

"We no longer feel that that is the case," she explained.

"So what I have been told is that it looks like the arrangement between the city and the Affordable Housing Trust isn't considered to be obligated under the Treasury guidance and this is really going to speed up our timeline. We have to have everything committed by the end of December."

The trust plans to contact those who have submitted letters of intent and ask for a full application before its next meeting. Final recommendations are staged for October.  

Earlier this summer, five affordable or partially affordable housing projects were reviewed: three from local organizations and two from wider-reaching developers. This includes Hearthway (formerly known as Berkshire Housing,) Berkshire Habitat for Humanity, and the Westside Legends.

"The awardees will have to demonstrate that these are shovel-ready projects, that they can have all of the financing that they need to complete these projects by the end of December of this year," Dodds reported.

"And then the last day for applicants who are working on these projects to actually use or lose funds would be November of 2026 so it does give them some flexibility of when they can get it."

The city feels that it is under a tight timeline to get the projects awarded, tied up, and ready to go, she added.


Mayor Peter Marchetti has reportedly communicated that this is not unique to housing projects.  Through reallocations, there may be an opportunity for the trust to disperse more than its allocated ARPA funds.  

"Determining where people are, where projects are, in the middle of their projected timelines is going on across all of the places that the city has awarded funds, which includes the nonprofits that receive funding, includes city projects as well that are in varying stages of completion," Dodds reported.

"There may funds are being reallocated through the ARPA team and with the mayor's final approval, the mayor has communicated that if the trust could prioritize the order of the awards and the dollar amount that we as a board feel the applicant is necessary for these projects, there may be an opportunity for there to be more than the $500,000 available for these projects if they can demonstrate that they're moving forward, they’re shovel ready, and that they have their other financing in place by the end of the year."

The Treasury has also expanded area median income limits for housing projects for up to 120 percent area median income.

Formerly, if the funds were to be used in disproportionately affected areas of the city (which is mostly the Morningside, West Side, and downtown areas,) they could be spent on housing up to 80 percent AMI. If working within the balance of the city, it came to about 65 percent AMI.

"The new guidance that came out from the Treasury now says that we can actually spend funds for up to 120 percent of median family income, which is a huge, huge difference when we're looking at what income brackets we could address with these funds," Dodds explained.

There is some language that alludes to rental housing, which she is going to clarify since there are homeownership projects that have expressed interest in the funds.

"My general feeling is that what Treasury is looking to do is get these funds allocated, get them out the door, and are broadening their approach because of that," she added.

"Nobody wants to see any of these funds left on the table."

Members discussed forming a subcommittee to expedite the review process. Dodds feels that the panel is worthy of leading the charge.

"I think we've got a real group of committed people here," she said.


Tags: affordable housing,   affordable housing trust,   ARPA,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories