image description
The bridge over Onota Brook on Peck's Road was closed last month because of its condition. The council on Tuesday approved seven utility pole installations and relocations to move the project along despite having maps they could barely read.
image description
Councilor at Large Earl Persip III objected to the barely legible maps and voted against the petitions.
image description

Pittsfield Councilor Demands Legible Maps from Project Applicants

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — One city councilor has a clear message for project applicants: "Make sure I can read your map."

Councilor at Large Earl Persip III was the lone vote in opposition to utility pole petitions from Eversource and Verizon New England on Tuesday night. The companies plan to install one new pole, relocate two existing poles, and set two anchor poles on Peck's Road for the Onota Brook bridge replacement.

The bridge was closed to traffic last month because of rapid deterioration and awaits a full reconstruction.

"I can't read the map. I don't know where the pole is going. I've said it a billion times. I say we table this until we get a map," he said.

"I can't approve anything that I can't see. I don't know where the pole is going, no one can show me where the poles are going, so I'm voting no. I've said this a zillion times to many, many people, many, many different organizations. If we can't read maps, how do we approve anything?"

Two maps were provided in the packet: one with an illegible outline of the intersection of Onota Street and Peck's Road with markers for the pole and another with a legible outline of the area. They are just drawings of the road and not an aerial photographic view.

Commissioner of Public Services and Utilities Ricardo Morales confirmed that the first provided image was illegible and that a second map was provided with the locations of the poles, street names, and the bridge location.

"This is an important project for us to complete in the process of moving these poles for the removal and then rebuilding of Peck's Road bridge," he said.

"It has taken a long time for this to be coordinated and that's why there's been a request to not push this further. It is a humble request from from me."

He said he understands that there have been difficult-to-read maps and drawings in the past but he considered this legible.  

Persip pointed out that he and Morales have had this conversation.

"If this is so important, why isn't the due diligence done to make sure we have the information?" he said.

"We've been doing this map thing for at least six years now with Eversource, with Verizon. It's not hard, we compliment when they do them good and so I'm a no-vote. There's nothing you can do here today that's going to make me a yes."

Eversource representative Nicole Scarborough reported that this should not affect any residential driveways.

"We're not going to put anything right next to somebody's driveway so it can get hit," she said. "We want to protect the poles. We want to protect the circuits and the wires that we have up there so we don't have outages."


Morales reported that ground has not been broken on the project but will be soon. The nature of the bridge renovation has changed to a total reconstruction after the Massachusetts Department of Transportation that found six areas of deterioration.

"The project, though, has started with fabricating the precast and demolition proposal," he said.

"It has changed since we had to close the building the bridge fully and that at the moment, is slated for full demolition to start end of the month."

Ward 7 Councilor Rhonda Serre didn't want to further delay the project by delaying this approval, pointing out that the road is closed and traffic has been rerouted through residential neighborhoods that aren't used to it.

She agrees that maps are a frequent problem.

"And knowing that we are ready to move forward and this project will actually — shovels will start soon, I would request that we consider finding a way to approve this tonight so that a further delay in these poles doesn't impact the reconstruction of the Pecks Road bridge any further," she said.

Morales explained that this was always a part of the process but it is coming before the council "in a rushed fashion" because of how the bridge demolition has to occur.

"Before we do that, we need to move the crane to a location where wires are in the way," he said. "So we need to first eliminate and move those wires out of the way so it is definitely a last-minute change. We were always going to move these poles but not specifically at this point in time."

Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren recognized that Persip has raised this issue many times to his agreement but in this case, he saw enough information to figure it out.

"Hopefully I'll never hear the word 'map' again," he joked.

Councilor at Large Kathy Amuso pointed out that "almost every time" Verizon is on the agenda, the council talks more about illegible maps.

"When you see these agenda items and the maps aren't clear, I'd like to you say, 'We're not even going to put it on the agenda,'" she said to President Peter White.

Persip said nobody could tell him what addresses the poles are going in front of and the council only has a general idea of the location.

"I've never been so irritated up here, I don't think," he said.

"This is such a small little thing. I agree, but it still baffles me that we are getting things like this presented to us."


Tags: bridge project,   eversource,   utility pole,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories