image description
A number of residents attended Tuesday morning's meeting of the Prudential Committee, some voicing a need for better transparency.

Dalton Fire District Tries to Clarify Prudential Committee Role

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

DALTON, Mass. — Prudential Committee Chair Daniel Filiault straight off clarified at Tuesday morning's meeting that the board would not be discussing a requested forensic audit requested by Fire Chief Christian Tobin. 

Tobin was suspended earlier this month over allegations of sexual harassment, grant overspending, and "employee concerns."

The agenda posted on Aug. 15 included two items: general business and a discussion of the duties of the Water Commissioners and Prudential Committee. A number of residents attended the 10 a.m. meeting at the Stationery Factory, some voicing a need for better transparency.

When asked if there will be an opportunity for the public to hear decision-making on the audit, Filiault  said it would be up to the Water Commissioners and it is not a part of what the Prudential Committee does.

Tobin has accused the commissioners of illegal wages and hour practices, unlawful public meetings, improper safety practices, employee medical and respiratory protection, the misuse of district credit card funds, falsification of records for personal or others' benefit, and other allegations.

"This meeting is solely for the purpose of discussing the duties of the Water Commission and the Prudential Commission and how we interact," Filiault said, adding that there was a Monday email sent out "full of inaccuracies" that included discussion of the forensic audit.

"The forensic audit, that is not a subject that is being discussed today. It was not on the agenda. It will not be discussed."

Resident Don Davis was "very confused about a lot of things," including the duties of the committee.

"I appreciate what everybody's done over all the years and everything but it seems like over the last few years, there's definitely some sort of a problem within the district," he said.

"And I think that we as citizens really need to understand there's a lot of very alarming issues that the citizens really should know about and understand it's kind of a status quo."

According to the bylaw:

"The Prudential Committee shall collect (through the Treasurer's Office), have charge of and expend, according to the order of the District, all moneys raised by taxation; shall, subject to the order and approval of the District purchase and sell real estate; and shall approve or disapprove the items in the budget submitted to it by the Board of Water Commissioners and authorize the expenditure of the amounts therein set forth as approved by it. It may authorize the Treasurer to expend the money of the District in accordance with and subject to the approval of the District, or in accordance with and up to the limits set by the budget previously approved by it and may authorize the Treasurer to borrow money in anticipation of fees to be received on account of the use of water supplied by the District."

The meeting was called after discussions with Board of Water Commissioners Chair James Driscoll. He explained on Tuesday that this aims to ensure that the interaction between the two bodies is workable and will be able to get things done.

"And we just wanted to have this meeting to determine what core parts of this that the Prudential Committee would like to do or would like to leave as it has been," Driscoll said.

"Prudential Committee, historically, has passed the budgets that the Water Commissioners have set up through the department heads, and they are briefed on the budget, and then they okay the budget, and that is the budget that goes to the voters," he said.

"They have been instrumental in looking at any of the financial situations with the district, as far as loans, things like that, is part of what we have our meetings with the Prudential Committee for so that being said, all we wanted to do is get together and make sure that we're both on the same plane."

Filiault noted that a similar meeting has been held in the past and it is "not an unusual act." He feels "very fortunate" to have two longtime members of the committee present who can attest to how it is run: Thomas Murray and Richard Olsted.

In Murray's opinion, the bylaws determine that the water commissioners are in charge of day-to-day operations and come to the committee for finances. .

"My understanding is that it has always been very clear: except for financial questions, the Prudential Commission does not get involved in the day-to-day operations of the Fire District," Filiault said, explaining that he has stepped up to help with issues over the past year as an individual and was not acting a member of the commission.



Driscoll said that as long as the bodies are in agreement that they will operate as they have been according to the charter and bylaws, he is "quite happy and looking forward to working with the Prudential Committee from here on out."

Water Commissioner Michael Kubicki agreed.

"In the past, it's always been a good relationship," he said.

"My understanding when I [was] elected to this position was the water commissioners ran the day-to-day, developed the budget, discussed the budget with the Prudential Committee, and the Prudential Committee had their input or any questions if they had anything that was a concern to them, and we operated under those guidelines."

Former fire chief James Peltier was put on administrative leave last year and then fired. He attended the meeting and asked why the committee was represented in his discipline if it was only supposed to be dealing with financial items.

It was explained that the Prudential Committee can go to any meeting it wants to.

"I'm speaking for several people that couldn't make it to this meeting because it was inconvenient during the day," Peltier said.

"What they're looking for is transparency."

There was a back and forth between him and Filiault, who alleged he was getting off the meeting's topic and said, "we're done."

"You may talk about anything that has to do with the correct duties of the water commissioners and the Prudential Committee," Filiault said.

"I do not want any more discussions about previous meetings or actions by the board in the past because it has nothing to do with today's agenda."

Water Commissioner Camillus Cachat said he has been on the board for nine years and it has operated well during that time.

"Everything that the board's done has been open to the public," he said.


Tags: fire district,   water commission,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories