image description

Pittsfield Health Board Considers Green Burials

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The use of green burials is rising and the Board of Health wants to be prepared in case they are requested in the city.

On Wednesday, the board discussed creating local guidance for green burials, which return a body to the ground after death with fewer environmental impacts. This generally means no embalming or use of caskets made with metal or hardwood.

Director of Public Health Andy Cambi was recently approached by a resident about this form of being laid to rest.   

"Our interest is that the bacteria, diseases can go into the water systems so I gave this resident what the state has for green burials," he said, explaining that there is a lot to comply with.

"I think we as a local board of health need to have our own process for regulations. So that was the first time that I've heard of an individual looking into it. It seems to be kind of an increase throughout the Commonwealth."

He reported that City Solicitor Stephen Pagnotta agreed it is good to have local regulations and a formal process for the city to cite. Cambi is going to look into zoning, speak to the Conservation Commission, and have something drafted for the next meeting.

"I think if we're gonna do it, we have to do it the right way," Chair Roberta Elliott said.

Mass.gov provides explanations for both home and green burials, which can coincide.

"A home burial means burying a person on privately owned residential property that is not an approved cemetery. Home burials are not prohibited by state law, but the decedent's family must first obtain written approval from the local BOH and the local governing body," the guidance reads.

"A home burial is only possible if the property is under the control of the decedent's family. Finally, those who do a home burial will need to note the burial on the deed for that property where the body is buried before the property can be transferred, as a home burial is likely to be viewed as an encumbrance on the land."

A home burial can also be a green burial, meaning that the body is not embalmed, no metal or hardwood is used to make the casket, no gravel liner or vault is used, and a low-profile grave marker is used or no marker at all.

The potential for bacteria, viruses, and other microorganisms from human remains to reach groundwater is identified as the biggest concern for public health.


"Research indicates though microorganisms can remain viable and transportable for many years following a burial, they are eventually attenuated by soils and lose viability," the state reports. "However, the fact that these organisms can remain viable for some time highlights the importance of siting burials in hydrogeologically appropriate areas."

Several sections of Massachusetts General law address this type of burial. Local boards of health are urged to consider local bylaws and regulations, site plan submissions, geological evaluations, serious pathogenic diseases, and setback requirements.

One green burial grave is recommended to be at least 300 feet from a private well whereas hybrid green burial areas that are part of a conventional cemetery should be 750 feet away.

Board member David Pill, also a member of the Knesset Israel Cemetery Committee, asked how burials on private property will be recorded, saying, "I'd be concerned that you buy a house you decide to put a swimming pool in … 

"There's been times where people have been where they're not supposed to be in the cemetery. I mean, it's worse when it's in your back yard."

Cambi explained that the state requires the home burial to be recorded in the Registry of Deeds.

In April, Dalton approved language for green burials.

Great Barrington is one of several dozen communities in the state that offer green burials, though it took three years to accomplish this. Stockbridge, Mount Washington, and the private Pine Grove Cemetery in Sheffield also allow natural burials.

In other news, there is hope for a charred multifamily house under a demolition order.

91-93 Orchard St. has been purchased and the new owner is eager to get to work. He explained that he and his son want to restore it as a summer project, but due to a miscommunication, he did not have a building permit secured for this meeting so that the demolition order could be rescinded.

The building suffered a two-alarm structure fire on July 4, 2022, that charred the front porch and front portion of the home. It was condemned a few days later.

The board agreed to allow Cambi to consult with each member before the next meeting if he secures the building permit for approval so that work can commence.


Tags: board of health,   burials,   cemetery,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories