Superintendent of School Joseph Curtis addresses the School Committee on Wednesday night in City Council chambers.
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The School Committee on Wednesday approved an ambitious timeline that could see the city's middle school reconfiguration implemented as soon as the 2025-26 academic year.
On a vote of 6-0 with one member, Diana Belair, absent, the committee accepted the proposal of Superintendent Joseph Curtis that would see a Middle School Restructuring Committee organized later this month.
That committee would continue studying possible grade configurations, assess data on student performance and gather feedback from stakeholder groups before presenting a final recommendation on reconfiguration to the School Committee in January 2025.
If all goes according to plan, the School Committee would make its final decisions on grade spans and the educational models for the, potentially, newly configured schools in February. The administration would work out an implementation plan in March.
Before voting to agree to the timeline, School Committee members agreed with Curtis that the plan was "vigorous" and that action was sorely needed to find solutions to long-term concerns about the current middle school structure.
"I think it's brave and appropriate that we are taking on the issues around middle school," Sara Hathaway said. "This isn't something that has suddenly exploded into a problem. Middle schools around the country have this issue."
And, Hathaway said, she has seen that issue hit very close to home.
"When I served on this committee a little over 20 years ago, I remember Dr. [William] Travis saying, 'We lose [students] in middle school,' " Hathaway said.
Vice Chair Daniel Elias said that last year he visited the city's middle school classrooms at the beginning of the school year and found teachers who were upbeat and optimistic.
"I was able to go back at the end of the year, and they were, for the most part, mentally defeated," Elias said. "I thought the school leadership did a good job, and the staff, despite being defeated, felt the leadership did a good job.
"That left me with the thought that it is an unattainable goal in the current configuration. We have to do something, because what we're doing now is not working. I've gotten a lot of feedback from a lot of people. They were just relieved that we were finally taking this on."
Curtis' presentation on Wednesday walked the committee through a couple of different potential paths — from maintaining the status quo (prekindergarten through Grade 5 elementary schools, 6-8 middle schools and high school) to a five-school model with students split by PK-1, Grades 2-4, Grades 5-6, Grades 7-8 and high school.
He stressed that none of the configurations he showed the committee were his recommendation. That recommendation will come from the Middle School Restructuring Committee that the elected officials on Wednesday authorized the superintendent to create.
Curtis said that, ideally, he would like to see the committee include about 25 members who would do much of the work in smaller working groups.
Given the compressed time schedule, Curtis will be asking for a major time commitment, with the MSRC meeting, initially, at least twice a month.
"I'm envisioning … once a month will not be enough to make this decision," Curtis said. "We'd start to meet right in September. I'd predict we'd meet at least every other week. That may be accelerated toward the end."
Curtis said he will create an invitation that will be well publicized to seek volunteers to serve on the comittee. His hope is that it will include: parents, guardians and caregivers; school staff and leaders; central office officials; elected officials; and union representatives. In answer to a question from School Committee member William Garrity, Curtis said the committee could include high school students who have the recent lived experience of the city's current middle schools; either way, he said he envisions focus groups to gather feedback from current students in the city's system.
"We'd invite roughly 30 people to participate, making sure we have representation from the groups I've outlined," Curtis said. "For example, we wouldn't have 30 staff members and no families. I would hope to have even participation from the groups I've mentioned."
The School Committee members were enthusiastic in their endorsement of Curtis' proposed timeline for taking action.
Elias noted that Curtis' presentation included a mention that six Massachusetts school districts already have gone to a grade 5 and 6 configuration for their middle school; regionally, that group includes Westfield, which operates Westfield Intermediate School. He suggested that the MSRC could benefit from the lessons learned in other districts.
"Most people are content and happy with the job we do at the elementary level," Elias said. "We see now at the high school level, some kids do come back. But we're losing them at the middle school. It's well past the point of having to do something."
"You're right," Cameron told Curtis, "this is an aggressive timeline. But it's been a problem for years, and I'm glad we're finally dealing with it."
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.
Your Comments
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary.
No Comments
BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule
By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.
Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.
Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.
The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some.
"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.
A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.
Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.
"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."
The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.
"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.
"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also."
Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.
In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.
Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.
Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.
"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.
Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.
"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.
The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the grant conditions were properly followed.
Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.
The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal. click for more
The town election is less than a month away and, unlike recent ones, all open seats are uncontested, with even a vacancy remaining on the Planning Board.
click for more