Pittsfield Proposes a Deputy Public Works Commissioner

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The city is looking to add another leadership position to the public works department.

The Personnel Review Board on Monday supported the creation of a deputy commissioner in the Department of Public Services and Utilities. The full-time position, if approved by the City Council, will have a Grade M-8 pay scale with a yearly salary ranging from $89,247 to $116,021.

This position would assist Commissioner of Public Services and Utilities Ricardo Morales.

"If we think back over my 16 years of being a city councilor, at one point in time, we had a commissioner of public services and a commissioner of public utilities. In some prior administration, we merged those two commissioners together with just one commissioner," Mayor Peter Marchetti said.

"I think if you pulled any member of the City Council, they would tell you that the workload for both commissioners to pull it into one has not really set up our commissioners to be able to be successful with everything that they need to be dealing with on both public services and public utilities as well as keeping up to date with the day to day operations."

Marchetti engaged with a former commissioner shortly after taking office in January and asked for him to offer suggestions about how the department could be run more efficiently.

One of his first questions was "One commissioner or two?"

"As a former commissioner, he quickly answered 'one' but he wanted to do his analysis and review of the department before it came forward. When he was done with his analysis, his report showed that he would stay with one commissioner but highly recommended the position of deputy commissioner. And so the deputy commissioner would report directly to the commissioner and handle much of the day-to-day operations and doing the field work and being on the ground with the staff," the mayor explained.

"I am still not sure whether I agreed with one commissioner or two but how am I going to argue with a former commissioner who's worked the job and has embraced his recommendation."

According to the job description, the position would assist the commissioner in planning, directing, and managing the operations and activities of the Public Services and Utilities Department. This involves overseeing various divisions, ensuring the efficient delivery of public works services, and fostering a collaborative work environment.

Morales explained that he was involved in the review and he realized that changes need to be made to set the department up for success.

"It was immediately impacted by the pandemic, that was in early 2020. We started getting there with the separation of some of the responsibilities with the creation of the business manager position, which essentially is meant to be a human resources and finance side of things into the department. And then the operational side is another crucial aspect of the operations department that formed the two parts of the three main roles that our department plays in the community," he said.

"The third one being the capital, large project vision for the city and that, among the final approval and the other responsibilities that would just fall under the commissioner, under myself in this case, would still be the commissioner's role, distinct from what the operations day to day responsibilities would be for the deputy commissioner."

He believes that this is "crucial" for the efficient operation of the department with more than 100 employees.


"We have 104 employees. We have increased employees in the last four years, five years, since I first started in the department. We run currently almost $30 million worth of operating work, most of it different from other departments in the large similar scale. Most of it is on the expenses side, rather than the human resources side," Morales said.

"We currently have $12 million worth of capital projects. We have a large capital project looming in the horizon with some upgrades to the water treatment plants."

All of these things were considered in the department review, he added, and having a deputy commissioner will ensure a balanced workload and improve service and fiscal responsibility.

"Given the information and the upgrade and what this would provide to the city in terms of the support and services I would I would support this," Board member Brian House said.

The panel also voted to upgrade the fire chief and city solicitor positions.

The fire chief's salary would be raised from a Grade M-11 salary ranging from $118,785 to $154,421 annually to a Grade M-12 salary ranging from $137,638 to $178,930 annually. The police chief is expected to make about $180,000 annually after a six-month review occurring later this year.

"As I have been transitioning into the office, which we are now well on our way to seven full months, I've been looking at some of the positions and I could not understand as I was going through the various grades for management why both public safety officials, the fire chief and police chief were not in the same category," Marchetti said.

"I was approached by the fire chief to discuss the differentials in that and the current salaries and looking at the differential between the current police chief and the current fire chief."

He added that they supervise about the same number of people and the fire chief has multiple stations to take care of "so as an effort for equity, I am looking to upgrade the fire chief to the same level as the police chief."

It was clarified that the $3,000 stipend received for being the director of emergency management will remain.

For the past several years, the city has been under a contract with Donovan O'Connor & Dodig LLP for city solicitor services. It was revealed that Stephen Pagnotta intends to retire at the end of the year and the firm has communicated that nobody is willing to take his position.

The city is looking into hiring a full-time solicitor rather than contracting for services. The board supported a reclassification from Grade M-9 with a salary ranging from $98,171 to $127,623 annually to Grade M-10 with a salary ranging from $107,983 to $140,377 annually.

"I will say that I think the city needs to take a dual approach and one will be to advertise or to recruit someone as a city solicitor and then also submit an RFP for the potential of engaging another law firm," Marchetti said.

"I don't think we're going to find a law firm in Berkshire County who is going to want to the position and quite frankly, I don't think that I as mayor want a city solicitor stationed in Boston that is only here when needed."


Tags: city solicitor,   fire chief,   public works,   salaries,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories