Pittsfield Sees Updated Code Thanks to Review Committee

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Ordinance Review Committee was thanked for its "tremendous" amount of work to update the city code.

"You don't realize that something is dated until you see someone rewrite the same thing in a different way so I appreciate you updating the language to be a bit more present," Ward 5 Councilor Patrick Kavey said during a joint meeting of the committee and the subcommittee on Ordinances and Rules last week.

Since September 2022, the committee has worked to rid the code of outdated language, typos, duplications, and conflicts — including the addition of gender-neutral language throughout.

This is required by the city charter every five years.

"We updated some of the processes that were outlined in the city code to reflect how they're actually being executed now. We also moved all of the fines and fees into one central location. Fines are in [Chapter] 4.5, fees are in 24 so someone reading the code could easily pick something out if they were looking for it. There were some conflicts between the individual chapters and those sections so that would be cleared up," Chair Jody Phillips explained.

"A couple of the other high-level things that we did is we incorporated gender-neutral language throughout the code, we standardized the annual reporting period for the departments, and just went through and tried to resolve some of the conflicts between the different chapters of the code."

General Code Corp., which provides the city's codification services, conducted an editorial legal analysis.

The subcommittee suggested a couple of edits on the redlined city code and those will be brought back to the full City Council. The document with all approved revisions will then be forwarded to General Code, which will apply blanket formatting, and a draft recodification ordinance will be prepared and submitted to the council for ordainment.

There was some concern about proposed changes to the section on city-owned motor vehicles that removed specifications for use, which ended in councilors advocating specific reporting standards.  These mainly apply to the police, fire and public services and utilities departments.

The code states that:

The heads of the various departments of the City shall be responsible for the keeping of records of the
use and maintenance of all motorized equipment used by their respective departments.

A daily record of the use of each piece of motorized equipment shall be kept, which record shall include the following:

(1) Name of each operator;
(2) Time each operator begins and ends operation of such equipment;
(3) Mileage at the beginning and end of each such operation;
(4) Servicing of gasoline and oil, time of such servicing and amount thereof; and
(5) Nature of repairs and number of man-hours expended for the making thereof.

The committee proposed removing 1-5 but after discussion, they will remain.

"The reason we decided to take up the names of the people that were doing it because one, you don't want to make city code that strict that it has identified an actual personnel by name but that the records kept at the garage when an employee signs in and signs out would actually be the document you would look to make sure that those with vehicles are the ones that that department had authorized," Ward 7 Councilor Rhonda Serre, who sits on the committee, reported.

She explained that it gives department heads the responsibility of making sure that the city logs are being used properly.


Kavey understands that they are trying to make the process easier but was hesitant about the amendment.

"I understand the name of the operator, as long as the department head is keeping track, but I know that there's been concern over misuse of these policies so recording less information or leaving it up to the department head who I know has a lot of other things to do, I don't know," he said.

"I feel like the mileage should still be there at the beginning of the end, the gasoline the, time for servicing, the nature of repairs, and the hour of the repairs."

Commissioner of Public Services and Utilities Ricardo Morales explained that these logs are kept and that most vehicles are tracked with GPS.

"When it becomes a little more complicated is for the folks under the foreman that are on-call and the reason these employees are taking the vehicle home is because they are on a rotating basis on some sort of on-call system that is not always going to match the the name we are going to put down. It's going to be essentially all of the employees that are on-call in a list," he said.

"Not all of them will always be taking the vehicle home. It will be on a rotating basis and the reason they're taking it home is for that nature, to respond to an issue on the streets without having to report first to their reporting base."

Kavey agreed that it is "a little repetitive" but said one department head could take records with all of the above information and another could provide "light" information on vehicle use.

Phillips said there is no harm in leaving the terms in there.  

"Thank you for all the work you did put into this," Council President Peter White said. "Because looking over the redline version, there's just so much nuance and changing to gender neutral. I think this is really moving in a better direction."

Ward 6 Councilor Dina Lampiasi agreed.

"This document is now a modern document," she said. "It's clearer in reading through it."

City Solicitor Stephen Pagnotta explained that the role of the committee was "relatively narrow in that was to update the ordinances" and the city is fortunate to have the committee's hard and efficient work.

"I just want to recognize the tremendous amount of time and work that was put in by this committee to go over these ordinances," he said. "It was a pleasure to watch their dedication and focus on this matter."

Pagnotta was also recognized as an "integral" part of the process as the advisor.

All documents about the code update can be found here.

Highlights of the suggested edits include:

  • Updating of processes and procedures throughout the document to reflect how the City currently operates.
     
  • Consolidation of all fines into Chapter 4 1/2 (Criminal and Noncriminal Enforcement) and all fees into Chapter 24 (Schedule of Fees). Currently, some fines and fees are listed within individual code sections, some only in Chapters 4 1/2 and 24 and some in both places with conflicting information at times. Where fine and fee information was removed within individual sections, it was replaced with language pointing the reader to the respective chapter containing the fine and fee information.
     
  • Consolidating this information into central areas will help to alleviate and prevent future conflicts when changes are made and assist with revision control as only one section will need to be updated.
     
  • Addition of a definition of "charter" and "city charter" and replacement throughout the code to reflect "City Charter" vs. references of "enacted by Chapter 72 of the Acts of 2013" for ease of reading.
     
  • Incorporation of updated gender-neutral language throughout the city code.
     
  • Standardize the annual reporting period for all departments where possible.

Tags: charter review,   city code,   ordinance & rules ,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories