Park Vandalism Has Pittsfield Looking to Enhance Enforcement

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Following significant wintertime vandalism of park facilities, the city is looking at a streamlined process for barring those who cannot follow rules and regulations.

On Tuesday, the Parks Commission designated James McGrath, park, open space, and natural resource program manager, as the point person when police want to enact a "No Trespass" order on an individual.

"There are times when it's important to look at enforcement of our rules and regulations and there are times when enforcement alone doesn't seem to be working," he said.

"Those are times when the police often think maybe we should effectively ban someone from this park for a period of time or for perpetuity but that's something that the police sort of sus out."

To ban a person from a park, the chair of the Parks Commission must sign a "No Trespass" order. For a streamlined process, the Pittsfield Police Department requested that McGrath be the signatory on behalf of the commission.

Chair Paula Albro requested that she be aware of the order but has no problem handing over the signatory responsibilities.

"The Police Department is looking at having the ability to more quickly enforce rules and regulations through trespass orders," McGrath explained.

"But in certain situations where they're finding their same repeat offenders, of whatever the violation may be. It's like, this person is really not getting it and we're having a hard time curbing this behavior, maybe a trespass order would be a tool we can use."

This is used sporadically but maybe something that is deployed more often in the future to deal with some issues in the parks, McGrath said. Former Chair Cliff Nilan remembered dealing with one of these orders.

"It has been used. I think the process was wrong," McGrath said.

"There had been at least one trespass order that I know that the Police Department had recommended and the park maintenance superintendent had signed it but I think once the police started working much more closely with the attorney, the city attorney said, 'Whoa, whoa, whoa. This needs approval from the ultimate managing authority, which is the chairperson of the commission,'

"So we've stepped back and said, 'Oh, there's a right way to do this. Let's make certain that we're being consistent with what the Commonwealth says is the appropriate way to actually trespass order.'"

Over the winter, vandals stripped major components from the splash pads at The Common and Clapp Park — including copper. Facilities at Durant Park and some of the Little League fields were also ransacked and/or vandalized and the city vowed to increase security measures to prevent this from happening again.

It was clarified that the police will always make the recommendation for a "No Trespass."  

"I think this commission simply wants to see park rules enforced," McGrath said, adding that this is not their line of work and hope is to have park rules enforced so they are a safe place for families and lawful activities.


He reported that several parks are seeing a rise in the types of behaviors that the city doesn't condone, creating unsafe conditions. While many of these activities are occurring in the urban core of the city, this effort will be in all Pittsfield parks.

"It's not as if we're just picking on The Common," McGrath said.

"This is something we would hope the police would begin to look at as their regular patrolling, enforcing rules around the entirety of the city just so that there is consistency in how they are approaching this."

Commissioner Simon Muil observed that if there is no enforcement, the rules seem redundant.  Similarly, Commissioner Anthony DeMartino feels that this will send a message to the community and ensure the parks are a safe place for everyone. 

"I think the message will get out quickly," McGrath said.

"But again, we've we need the assistance of the Pittsfield Police Department and I think they're bringing to us an opportunity and overture for 'Hey, we want to help you.'"

In other news, a handful of summer events for the public were approved:

The PPD will hold a National Night Out at The Common on Aug. 7 from 5 to 7 p.m. Officer Darren Derby reported that the event will be the "same as last year, very simple."

It will include bouncy houses, free food, balloon art, and a DJ.

• Christian Assembly Berkshire will hold a kids' outreach event at Dorothy Amos Park on Aug. 10 from 1 to 4 p.m. The event will include pickup basketball, game painting, and food.

"It's super simple," Youth Director Hannah McIntosh said. "We want our youth in our church to kind of just extend love and connection with the kids and I think Dorothy Amos Park is a great strategic spot to do that."

• The third annual Revel in Recovery event will be held at The Common on Sept. 7 from 1 to 5 p.m.  Program Director Julie Macdonald said it is a celebration during recovery month that allows people to have fun together and interact.

There will be a band from 2 to 4 p.m., speakers, poetry, and kids activities.

"The idea is not just celebrating recovery, but showing the general public that people in recovery are our creative people," Macdonald said.

 


Tags: public parks,   vandalism,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories