image description

Pittsfield Working on Decades-Old Drainage Issue in Ward 3

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The city is working to solve a more than 30-year-old drainage problem on Newell Street.

The Public Works and Utilities committee heard an update Monday on a project to address flooding at 9 Newell St. Water runoff reaching the drainage outlet behind the property is flooding it, unable to reach an intermittent stream meant to carry that runoff.

"This is the situation I inherited and I want to make sure that the residents and the families around that area can have this issue resolved. They've been told that it would have been done this year and it's a problem," Ward 3 Councilor Matthew Wrinn said.

Commissioner of Public Services and Utilities Ricardo Morales agreed.

"I wish we could be faster at this. It is something we’ve all inherited, as you’ve mentioned. We want to get this done. We’re working towards that," he said.

"Right now, we would not be in this position if we had not spent the time we have spent looking at design options to get to this point."

Work includes extending the outfall with a pipe following the route of the intermittent stream and eventually releasing the water into it that leads to the east branch of the Housatonic River.  Morales explained that he has $400,000 in fiscal year 2024 capital improvement funds for the project and it will likely cost between $500,000 and $600,00, requiring an additional request.

The additional costs are based on the "now evident" extent of the work and land acquisition.

From the beginning, the main barrier has been land conservation and natural resources permitting. With the new design, the city is aiming only to require a local Conservation Commission permit and the work can likely be bid in the fall with construction starting next spring.

"The intent is to get into the Conservation Commission agenda for August," City Engineer Tyler Shedd reported.

The issue goes back to flood mitigation efforts in the 1930s when an oxbow was buried.


"The answer is always money. You can throw more money at something to get it done sooner. We could do this project in an entirely different way at a greater cost and avoid all permitting entirely but it involves rerouting and completely redoing the stormwater drainage structures on Elm Street," Shedd explained.

"The drainage on Elm Street, generally underground, goes from William Street down the neighborhoods to Elm, and then at Elm, it tries to continue across Newell and everything because there used to be the oxbows there, where those were closer."

He said the drainage could be routed to go west down Elm Street to the river but it would involve tearing up a half mile of roadway, adjusting the elevations, dealing with sewer and water conflicts, and it would be a million-dollar project.

Morales added that this would be "essentially restructuring everything" and that is not presently on the table.

"What's on the table is taking this outfall and upgrading it to something that's much more, not only environmentally friendly but friendlier to the neighbors around this area, especially 9 Newell Street., and to do that, we have to deal with permitting," he said.

Wrinn explained that he really wants the project to get done and residents hoped to see an outcome this year.

"I’m going to stay on top of it," he said. "I appreciate all the work you guys have done."

Shedd pointed out that the project is on private property requiring easements.  The biggest property owners in the work area are the Patriot Car Wash on Elm Street.

Ward 5 Councilor Patrick Kavey asked what would happen if property owners didn’t agree to the easement.  It could be taken through the eminent domain process.

"One of the important things of having the easement is that the easement allows you to access it to maintain it, so they wouldn't be able to in the future, say ‘You can't get back in here,’ they can't build a fence and keep you out. You have an easement to maintain it. So I think that's another reason why it's important to go this way," Shedd said.

"I think if it really hit absolute worst case, we can't get the easements are the rights to build the project the way it's shown, I think that's when we're forced into the most expensive and extreme option of finding another way through a city street."


Tags: flooding,   road project,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories