image description
The City Council approved a raft of easements required for the reconstruction of East Street next year.

Pittsfield Council Paves Way for East Street Reconstruction

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City Council approved multiple property easements for the state's reconstruction of East Street, paving the way for construction next year.

This includes takings of 12 permanent easements, 14 temporary easements, and two layout alterations and permanent parcel takings for the reconstruction project led by the state Department of Transportation.

A total of $10,000 will be paid out to property owners for permanent easements, with 765 East Street LLC receiving almost $4,000 for two parcels of land. Temporary easements will cost more than $73,000, with 765 East Street LLC reviewing the largest award of more than $11,600.

There is also $1,680 in damage awards to two property owners for permanent takings.  

City Engineer Tyler Shedd explained that the city acquires land for public right of way through fee takings, that permanent easements are for utilities, and that temporary easements are for use during construction.

"All of the easements that need to be acquired on the [Pittsfield Economic Development Authority] properties and the [General Electric] properties were acquired by the state on behalf of the city because they can't be taken by eminent domain due to the consent decree," he said.

"It has to be by agreement, and the state was already needing to negotiate with both of those two entities and sort of felt like it was just simpler for all parties as the state just negotiated for all those properties throughout the whole project."

The approximately $13 million project will widen the corridor from the intersection of East Street and Lyman Street to the intersection of East Street and Merrill Road, including landscaping and pedestrian amenities. This aims to improve safety, accessibility, and aesthetics with minimum environmental impacts while supporting Pittsfield as a gateway city.

It is funded by the 2024 Transportation Improvement Program. Bidding is scheduled for August with construction beginning in spring 2025.

Councilor at Large Alisa Costa asked if the extension of the Ashuwillticook Rail Trail will be included in the scope of work and Shedd reported that this is working toward the goal of connecting it to the downtown.



"The state owns Merrill Road from where they're extending the rail trail from Crane Ave to Dalton (Avenue) near where General Dynamics is and sort of the abandoned Petricca property, that was a point of discussion over the winter," he said.

"So that rail trail is being extended. There are plans with the state to get the bike facilities from that point down to East Street so things are a little bit out of sequence. There will be a shared-use path as part of this project that goes from the intersection of East and Merrill to the intersection of Woodlawn or a little bit past there."

It was pointed out that the whole extent of the project was designed by MassDOT.

"This entire project is designed by the DOT and their selected designer. We have input in the sense of it is our right of way but we don't have the final calls on any designs," Commissioner of Public Services and Utilities Ricardo Morales reported.

"Similar to other state-funded projects, even when we are the proponent and we select the design firm and we run the design, we still have to get approval by the state and meet their criteria when they fund the construction of them."

At this point, no funds have been put down by the city other than designing, he reported.

Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren asked that this point be clarified, predicting pushback from residents.

"I guarantee there's going to start being criticisms about the blending into a single lane, the turn lanes, the shared path, I can go on and on," he said.

"And it's going to be that the city of Pittsfield once again is screwing up one of their major roads because they don't know what they're doing."


Tags: Ashuwillticook Rail Trail,   MassDOT,   road project,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories