CBRSD Working on Regional Agreement Education

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — The Central Berkshire Regional School Committee agreed to start an education campaign after the proposed regional agreement failed in three of the district's seven towns. 
 
The item failed during the Hinsdale annual town meeting on May 15, the Peru town meeting on June 1, and Cummington's special town meeting on June 7. The regional agreement needed six out of the seven towns to vote in favor of passing. 
 
Until an updated agreement is approved, the school district will continue to operate under its current agreement and follow state law. 
 
The original agreement, created in 1958, has been amended several times and approved locally but never by the state Department of Education, which is required. 
 
During the School Committee meeting last week, committee members highlighted the lack of trust between the district and towns stemming from the 2019 decision to vote by popular vote for the approximately $72 million Wahconah Regional High School building project. 
 
The towns that voted against the regional agreement wanted to require a unanimous vote, not a two-thirds vote, for all decisions regarding debt incurrence. 
 
Whether this can be done is unclear because two-thirds is state law, School Committee Chair Richard Peters said. 
 
The district has worked for a year and a half with representatives from all seven towns and the Massachusetts Association of Regional Schools on the update to the  agreement, Peters said, and they are 99 percent or 100 percent done if changes can not be made.
 
Rather than going back to the drawing board, Peters recommended bringing in representatives from MARS, legal, and possibly the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education to inform town officials what changes can be made to the agreement. 
 
The district did not do an educational campaign for the agreement, aside from going to select board meetings, Peters said, because the update of the regional agreement was thought to be uncontroversial, as nothing is going to change from what they currently do. 
 
The district may not be able to accommodate every single town without getting a home-rule petition, which could take years, committee member David Stuart said. 
 
"I do want to remember that this agreement is more about the towns than it is about us. We have compliance we have to do within the regional agreement, but this is really their agreement," Stuart said. 
 
"Part of going back and listening to some of the towns or all of the towns is to find out what they're willing to do, what steps they're willing to take if they want to try and change state law if they want to try and get home rule or whatever. It's also on them to take some steps to get what they want in this."
 
Committee members recommended reaching out to parents to encourage them to attend their town meeting and inform them about the agreement details through digital channels.  
 
They also suggested collaborating with select board and finance committee chairs to educate them about the agreement's details and requirements in the hopes of gaining their support. 
 
Some voters may base their decision on the advice of their select board as they often have more knowledge on all the issues that are voted on, School Committee member Art Alpert said. 
 
The failed document incorporates updated language and includes information to meet the requirements of the state DESE.
  
This proposed update agreement that failed was preliminarily approved by DESE, and the commissioner would have been signed off after the towns' approval.
 
The draft more clearly describes the budget and apportionment process and the agreement amendment process. It also includes two pathways for towns to withdraw from the district if they ever choose to do so. 
 
The proposed draft also included "required provisions regarding Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) and pension liabilities." 
 
These provisions ensure that all "member towns carry their fair share of these costs in the event that a town is added or if a town withdraws." 
 
There is also a provision for the agreement to be reviewed every five years in case future changes are needed.

Tags: CBRSD,   regional agreement,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories