image description
The designers have shaved $2 million off the Wahconah Park project, bringing the cost to $28.4 million.

Wahconah Park Committee Moving Forward with $28M Design

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Architect Salvatore Canciello goes over the new numbers with the Wahconah Park Restoration Committee last week.

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The proposed reconstruction of historic Wahconah Park has been trimmed by $2 million.

"We do have a budget issue," architect Salvatore Canciello told the Wahconah Park Restoration Committee on Thursday.

The panel has recommended a move from the schematic design to the design development phase for a $28.4 million rebuild of the grandstand and parking lot. Through value engineering, S3 Design was able to shave almost $2 million off the original $30 million price tag — half of the savings goal.

With $18 million committed between grant funding and capital borrowing, the committee must work to fill the $10 million gap.

Chair Earl Persip III is hopeful that the committee can actualize these funds, explaining that he doesn't have the answer to raising $10 million but "it's just finding the right people and right way to approach that and I don't think we've come up with a plan to do that or a strategy to do that yet."

The design development stage is where fine details and construction documents are developed.

"From the staff perspective and I think from conversations we've had, I think it makes sense for us to move into design development so we can get this project to a shovel-ready stage," Park, Open Space, and Natural Resource Program Manager James McGrath said.

"We have the funding in place. There was funding that has of course been provided by the capital budget. There was $2 million in the capital budget and then there was $3 million allocated by a congressional earmark. We've been using those funds to date to pay our consultants. We have ample funds to continue to move into design developments and we will have approximately $3 million remaining for which to use toward hard construction."

Mayor Peter Marchetti is willing to borrow $15 million, bringing the current commitment to $18 million.  The project will also go to the Parks Commission before it goes to bid.

To avoid further inflation, the committee aims to get the recommendation on Marchetti's desk by August to inch toward a yearlong construction beginning next year. Costs escalate by about $1 million per year and the initial estimate began construction around this time.

"The longer we wait on this project the more expensive it is going to be," committee member Cliff Nilan said.


The 31,000-square-foot build breaks down into $23 million for construction costs and the remainder in soft costs. No work is currently proposed for the playing field.

Site improvements have increased by $1.2 million because the soil was in far worse condition than planners thought, increasing the number of piles required to support the building.

"We did make some changes to the roof forms to simplify them. We also opened up more of the space to react to some of the comments we got from the historic preservation commission that wanted it more open and more visible all the way through," Canciello explained.

"So we try to respond to some of those comments to make it more transparent, looking through to the stadium."

Earlier this year, the local historical panel agreed to draft a letter of support to the Massachusetts Historical Commission, which told the city that it "encourages consideration of project alternatives that would preserve the historic grandstand."

"There was a federal process, a federal review that has expired and now everything is back to Mass Historic Commission," McGrath reported.

"They've received our final filing and they have 30 days in which to comment."

The city has indicated that it is agreeable to a memorandum of agreement with the commonwealth stipulating how it will mitigate the impact of losing a historic structure.  This includes a proposal for a "very robust, historically appropriate interpretive panel" as part of the stadium build that describes the site's history and baseball in Pittsfield.

"There were really no initial comments from Mass Historic, there are no comments from the federal review, so I think we're in good shape," McGrath said.

"And often, what we've heard from the consultant is that it's really the municipality that proposes a mitigation strategy working with their historic commission, and that often is not countered by the Commonwealth. So we've advanced something which we think is appropriate and respectful and it addresses the loss of the historic structure."

Within 30 days the city will have a "definitive understanding" but he doesn't force any issues from this point forward.


Tags: Wahconah Park,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories