image description

Pittsfield Schools Assign Placeholder for $200K Budget Cut

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The school district found a $200,000 cost savings in computer replacements to accommodate the City Council's budget cut.

The School Committee approved an $82,685,277 revised school budget on Wednesday with savings that are "essentially a placeholder." Assistant Superintendent for Business and Finance Kristen Behnke explained that the amount allotted for hiring may exceed salary totals and could go toward the reduction.

The budget for instructional computer replacements is now $100,000.

"As we bring those staff on board, what we'd like to do is take a look at those. It's possible that we may find some savings in that area and if that happens that would be a way that we could keep any reductions away from the classroom because we would not need to make further reductions of (full-time equivalents) but we would get the savings from the salary line items," she said.

"I really won't have a better idea of that until probably sometime in October but until that happens, I'm suggesting that we put this in as a placeholder."

She said the district has done a good job at judicious use of Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief funds this spring to have Chromebooks back in middle school classrooms. This was done last year in the elementary schools and replacements will be available for high schoolers.

Concern has risen about the high damage and replacement rates for the computers and it was decided that middle schoolers will no longer take them home.

"This is certainly not something we can make a permanent change to," Behnke said, explaining that the line item has been $300,000 for over a decade, and more than $900,000 was spent on it in fiscal year 2023.



She believes that the district will be safe until the end of the year but if savings aren't realized in the salary lines they will look at other areas.

"We thought it was incredibly important that we declare near immediately that we will not be making any more staffing reductions after the motion passed," Superintendent Joseph Curtis said.

"As you know, our staff get very nervous when they hear about further reductions and might avail themselves of other opportunities in our county, which they are plentiful, so we wanted to declare that immediately. We thought this was certainly a viable solution coupled with the decision that we did make not to send home Chromebooks to middle schools anymore."

At the preliminary approval of the city's $216 FY25 budget, the council cut the school budget by $200,000 following what a councilor described as "unprofessional" comments from the committee.

Curtis assured the committee that it would not cut additional staff and members agreed that they need better collaboration with the council.

William Garrity said his first budget season on the panel was an interesting one. He does not want this to become a trend and hopes it is a "one-time thing."

"I think my thought is I don't want to do this again next year and so I think working with the City Council to ensure that we don't have to do this," said the first-term committee member.

"Because this is probably, in my view, not the best fiscal practice for us to do but I think it's the right way to go if we want to ensure that our classrooms are not impacted by this cut."


Tags: fiscal 2025,   Pittsfield Public Schools,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories