Lanesborough Rebuff of Gold Star Exemption Dismays Pittsfield Officials

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — Pittsfield officials are disappointed that Lanesborough rejected a proposal for Gold Star family tax exemptions, clarifying that the city proudly adopted this years ago.

City Clerk Michele Benjamin, Assistant City Clerk Heather Brazeau and her husband, Mark Brazeau, (former School Committee member) comprised an open letter to the town's Select Board expressing they were "disheartened" by the annual town meeting vote.

"As residents of a fellow city within the Commonwealth of MA, we are disappointed to hear about the denial of adoption for tax exemption Chapter 59, Section 5, Clause 22H for families of our fallen military heroes at the Annual Town Meeting held on June 11, 2024," the letter reads.

"After watching this public meeting, disappointed was not a strong enough word. We were fully disheartened for the family of Staff Sergeant Jacob Galliher along with the future families within the town of Lanesborough. Instead of adopting a clause to assist families of fallen heroes, it was suggested that a bridge, park, or another city project be dedicated in SSGT Galliher's name. Although these are great honors, we would like to remind you that the new coffee shop located in Lanesborough at the Village of Greylock Plaza is a family funded project to honor SSGT Galliher, which is also included on your fiscal year tax rolls."

Galliher, 24, a staff sergeant in the Air Force, was killed last year when the CV-22 Osprey he was on crashed off the coast of Japan during a joint military exercise. Last week, his family opened a coffee shop, Jake's Java, on Williamstown Road in his honor.

At the annual town meeting, it was expressed that the adoption of this clause would burden the town's taxpayers by raising the tax rate and would negatively impact the town's overlay account to make up the difference.

"During the meeting comments were shared by a resident that they thought North Adams, MA was the only other municipality near their community that had adopted this clause, and that Dalton and Pittsfield had not," the letter adds.

"We are here to correct this statement on behalf of a neighboring community as our city proudly adopted this clause in May of 2022."


Reportedly, one town resident said that if the clause was adopted, people would move to another town.  Most people looking for a new home and community to live in are not basing their decision on this fact, the three letter writers said, and families of military personnel killed on duty would most likely stay in the home where they raised their children to keep the memories close to their hearts.

"We ask you if any of you have ever met a service member who signed up to fight for our country for money or future benefits?"

The article was proposed by Select Board member Timothy Sorrell.

"I propose this warrant because I think it's the very least we can do to the parents who have lost the child due to active duty," he said at the annual town meeting.
 
"Other towns have done it, I don't know why we haven't, but I think we're sending a good message to support the families of our servicemen, especially those who have died in the line of duty."

Deborah Maynard, who was elected to the Select Board last week, voted against an article.  

"They wanted to grant the full abatement for taxes as a local option, not a state option, and the state does not reimburse for any of that and I think our town is so small and it's not a rich town where we could absorb — I didn't feel we could absorb that," she said on election day.

"And that is the only reason from a financial perspective. Emotionally, obviously, my heart goes out to any person that has lost a family member. It was not an emotional decision. It was strictly a financial decision."

Maynard recommended that they be honored in other ways such as bridge, pavilion, or park dedications.

The letter thanks people who took a stand and spoke proudly on behalf of veterans, active military, and families of American heroes. It also thanks the people who supported the clause at ATM and hopes that before the next one, the individuals who denied it think about these families more, and research what other communities including the ones right next door are doing to better assist these families.

"As residents of Pittsfield, we feel honored and lucky to have some of SSGT Galliher's family in our community that currently benefit from this tax exemption clause. This clause will never bring their beautiful fallen hero home, but it is with hope this benefit assists with some of the burden these families will carry forever," it reads.

"Will one family whose son made the ultimate sacrifice for our country and your freedom to speak out at a local meeting is not going to hurt your tax rolls. A family who is honoring their son at the Local Coffee shop by bringing more revenue into your town is not hurting your tax rolls."


Tags: tax exemption,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories