Springside Pump Track Planners Want Time, City Commitment

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Planners of the Springside bike skills park would like more support from the city and more time but the Parks Commission is ready to see wheels moving.

They first came to the commission in 2020 looking to donate a pump track and bike skills park to Pittsfield, citing the plot behind Reid Middle School as a great spot for accessibility to the Morningside neighborhood.

In four years, the cost of asphalt alone has doubled. The 2021 design's cost is seeing a reported increase of about 50 percent, originally quoted for $400,000.

Recognizing the need to pivot, planners last month asked the commission for more time to re-evaluate the project and fundraise. They were expected to present a "goal for a new approach towards the same goal" and "concrete options" in July but, upon request, that was extended to August during last Tuesday's meeting.

This could include a budget or phased design.

"The process to get us to this point has been arduous, at the least, to come to an agreement on what is the best fit. To be clear, we wouldn't even be having this conversation if we didn't feel that it was a positive thing for the park but the applicant came to us with it,"  Commissioner Anthony DeMartino said.

"This is not the city soliciting an opportunity to put a new feature into our park."

He said the commission would like to "kick the dust" off this project because it has been treading water for so long.

"We want to see progress and movement on it because we haven't seen much for a while."

Garrett Pulley of the Berkshire Mountain Bike Training Series is "curious how invested the city is as a whole," pointing to terms in the memorandum of understanding that puts maintenance responsibilities on the biking organizations involved and expressing a want for financial support.

Commissioners expressed that they have supported the project for years.

"The way I sort of read all of this is that we're just getting permission and nothing else from the city and, again, high-level statement but it is tough," he said.

"It's tough to see how we're going to fund this, how we're going to take care of this. It's all being done by volunteer work that this is just our it's not even our second job."


Pulley said the buy-in he is hoping to regain is assistance in facilitation. He asked if the city could help the planners secure grant funding or market their fundraising efforts.

"Does the city have any way to help raise the extra funds for, frankly, like a requirement you guys really need," he said. "This is something the city needs and we want to give that to you but yeah, having a little bit of extra funds to go towards that requirement that would be a big milestone for us."

Alison McGee of the Berkshire New England Mountain Biking Association, who originally proposed the project, said looking at ways the commission and the city could potentially be invested intros doesn't always need a financial investment.

Pulley would also like to "go back to the MOU," as "the responsibility that I feel like is being put on these organizations as a whole, the feeling that I got was that you really don't believe us." It was signed between the city, New England Mountain Bike Association, Shire Shredders, and Berkshire Mountain Bike Training Series.

The MOU, approved early this year, stipulates that money raised for the demolition of the park will be held in a city fund with half of the initial cost given back in a five-year period and the remaining 50 percent given back in a 10-year period if not used.

It also stipulates that the organizations maintain the park under a plan that is developed as part of the formal design process, obtain an insurance policy naming the city as an additional insured, and that either party can terminate the agreement if there are insufficient funds raised for the construction and removal.

"Revisiting that is probably — I don't want to say it's off the table, but it's not very much on the table," said DeMartino.
 
"Getting us to that point was an inordinate amount of work on our part, all the organizations involved, the city."

He said this is an "enormous investment" of space and resources and if the bike skills park is not well maintained, it becomes a burden to the city.

McGee said a recent bicycle film festival raised about a thousand dollars and a majority of it is hoped to go to the bike skills park. She also reminded the commission that there is a matching donor interested in the project.

"I know that when I was originally bringing forward and saying that we would fund it in full, a large part of that drive and the same thing with the putting it forward as an entire project was to expedite it and that was the goal behind that was if we are able to do this and have this happen quickly while we have these this budget, that was the motivator for that," she said.

"For me and in speaking with people who are partnering with me now, that's part of why that is coming up again because the expediting didn't happen and so it changes the reality a bit and so not trying to backtrack on what was presented for sure. I do want to make sure you understand that when we said that, that was meant with full intention but it was the intention was to try to make it easier and more direct, which it hasn't really been."


Tags: bicycling,   public parks,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories