Pittsfield Council Preliminarily OKs Water Sewer Calculation, Rates

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City Council is amicable to a new calculation for water and sewer rates.

A formula-based approach that aims to fairly adjust rates yearly was preliminarily approved along with an eight percent water and sewer increase for fiscal year 2025. Mayor Peter Marchetti's proposed ordinance bases rates on the Consumer Price Index Factor (CPIF) and the Operational Stability Factor (OSF.)

"Any mayor would love to take the City Council out of the process, say 'Here's the formula.' Every year, bang, there's those rates. We didn't do that," Marchetti said.

"We wanted to be fair and transparent and here's our formula, you guys still need to approve it so again, it isn't something happening downstairs in the corner office all by myself trying to make stuff."

Commissioner of Public Service and Utilities Ricardo Morales displayed a graph of rates over the last 10 years and said, "we have been all over the place." He thanked the council for asking the city to provide a history of rate changes because it was not much of a consideration in the past.

With a method that systematically changes rates, Morales said that the erratic line can be calmed, more programmatic, and more purposeful.

"This method provides predictable changes, it provides stability to our rate structure, it promotes a sense of transparency because you know what to expect at the very least on the CPI side and you know what's going to come if we are proposing more improvements to our infrastructure," he explained.

"It improves our resource management and accounts for our current and future needs."

The CPIF is a way to adjust for inflation or deflation and is calculated by comparing the year-over-year change in February of the CPI index for water and sewer, the administration says, and the OSF aims at ensuring enough funding for future capital upgrades, maintenance, and unexpected challenges with a ten percent cap.

The council voted to change that to an eight percent cap, as motioned by Councilor at Large Earl Persip III.

Currently, the city ordinance states that sewer and water charges are established from time to time by the commissioner of public services and utilities and adopted by the City Council. Rates are computed based on the total amount budgeted for sewer works operation and administration plus equipment replacement, capital improvements, depreciation, and projections of water use and wastewater discharge by system users and other necessary factors.

"Currently it essentially states that the commissioner sets some number and submits it to the City Council for approval. That is pretty much unchanged," Morales said. "What I'm proposing tonight and in this change for an ordinance is how we get to do that."

The CPI is tied to water and sewer metrics that affect daily activities as well as the budget and revenue based on infrastructure needs, he said, and the OSF captures what the city needs to cover to be able to operate facilities and infrastructure in a sustainable way without deferring maintenance and upgrading systems to meet demands.


"With this, we look at essentially two goals: we have a retained earnings goal and we have a debt service goal," Morales added.

Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren was not convinced, stating that if the goal is to make it more planned and predictable with fewer council votes, the ordinance does not do it. He does not support the OSF portion of the ordinance.

"It doesn't change the need for an annual City Council vote," he said. "It works against planning, it works against predictability."

Coming from a career in banking, fundraising, and economic development, Ward 7 Councilor Rhonda Serre "really truly deeply" appreciated the risk management attitude taken in developing this.

She noted that it is "very common" in most business worlds — and government doesn't always work like the business and we don't want it to — but at the same time, it's good to look at best practices and the setting of guardrails for upper and lower limits.

"There may be some discussion of whether 10 percent is the right level for it but I do like the design of this, I think it is sound practice and it would be very good to help us as a City Council from year to year quickly and efficiently be able to judge whether or not we feel like sewer and water programs are going forward in a way that we as a council, expect."

Councilor at Large Alisa Costa appreciated the work put into this and said it is a better way to come up with rates so that they can be debated properly.

"It's important that we're investing in our infrastructure and that we don't break the backs of our taxpayers and our residents by doing that," she said.

Marchetti explained that he told Morales to find a formula that works, noting that the cap was set as a protection. He noted that this process didn't previously consider the future.

"We had some 25, 30, 45, 50 percent increases but if you look at the year or two prior, we didn't raise any rates," he said.

The proposed water and sewer rates would raise the average water bill for one toilet by about $24 per year, rising from $295.52 in FY24 to $322.44, and the average sewer bill by about $30, rising from $378.80 in FY24 to $409.12. The annual bill would total around $732.

Additional toilets would rise from about $149 in FY24 to about $161 for water and about $190 in FY24 to about $205 for sewer, totaling about $366 annually. Metered water would rise from $2.16 per cubic foot in FY24 to $2.33 for water and from $4.50 to $4.86 for sewer.

In FY24, water rates rose 12 percent and sewer rates 25 percent.




 


Tags: sewer rates,   water bills,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories