image description
Pittsfield residents check out the size of the proposed toter at the third and final information session Tuesday on the city's trash proposal.

Pittsfield Residents Share Positive, Negative Feedback at Final Trash Hearing

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Commissioner of Public Services and Utilities Ricardo Morales goes over the proposal designed to save the city $80,000 a year. 

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Some say the city's new toter trash proposal will be more aesthetically pleasing while others are concerned that their street doesn't have the space for automated collection.

The last of three hearings for the upcoming contract with Casella Waste Management for trash and recyclables was held at Herberg Middle School on Tuesday. On the table is a move to automated pickup utilizing 48-gallon toters, which would be at no cost to residents unless they require additional toters and that would save the city $80,000 per year.

Appleton Avenue resident Dottie McGurn raised concerns about the system on her steep, crowded street with multifamily homes where many residents park in the road.

"Appleton Avenue, even in the winter time, they don't make people move their cars," she said.

"And our garbage right now is put on the sidewalk with all the cars parked in front of them so my concern is how are we going to get that machine to come up over the top of all those parked cars and pick up the trash on the sidewalk or are we going to enforce the no parking laws?"

Commissioner of Public Services and Utilities Ricardo Morales explained that the toters should be against the curb, on the edge of the road, or on the grass strip three feet away from any objects including the other bin.

"The same people that park their vehicles there need to deal with the garbage and they need to put it somewhere around away from their vehicles," he said.

McGurn asserted that from 140 Appleton Ave. to Dawes Avenue, cars are parked back to back on the street and there is no room to put trash near the road.  

"What I'm going to say is that in specific cases like Appleton Ave, it might be a good idea to sit down with the Casella to discuss where they can be safely picked up," Morales said, explaining that automated services happen everywhere and there is undoubtedly a solution.

The goal is to execute a contract by July 1 with the new system fully implemented by October but the contract needs approval from the City Council first.

Morales said if the city wants to keep a fiscally responsible budget, trash removal in Pittsfield needs to change. Trash pickup for fiscal year 2025 is around $5.1 million and has doubled since the early 2000s.

"We currently are not able to manage our trash and recyclables in a sustainable way," he said. "The industry is changing. The way we deal with recyclables is changing."

The proposal aims to reduce each household's waste to 1,370 pounds annually.

Every household would receive two toters at no cost, one for trash and one for recycling.  Apartment buildings up to four units will receive a set of toters per unit and those who would like additional trash toters can pay about $40 quarterly.



Toters would need to be placed at the curb at 7 a.m. on collection day, which varies throughout the city.  If the bin is overflowing and the lid cannot close or bags are placed outside of the bin, it won't be picked up.

The draft agreement includes residential drop-off at the facility on Hubbard Ave.

There was a mixture of positive and negative commentary during the presentation, with one resident thanking the city for bringing forward the "right proposal at the right time."

A McKinley Terrace resident likes the idea though she did recognize that the 48-gallon recycling toter may be a little ambitious, recognizing that her family could fill it but they are an exception.

"I'm not worrying about the wind whipping away my recycling, I'm not going to worry as much about bins tipping over, and it looks better in a community," she said.

"And I think Pittsfield needs a little more pride in how it looks."

Another resident expressed concerns about the size of the containers, saying her household uses a 20-gallon trash bin and one of the small blue recycling containers per week.  She said with this larger-sized toter, people will be tempted to put trash and recyclables into one so they don't have to carry two to the curb.

"I don't know how many other people might be in this situation but I would look at that photo and say, 'You know what, I'm going to put my trash in there and my recycles in there and I'm going to call it a day,'" she said.

"I don't know if you've accounted for that. I know that's not what you want the program to do."

Morales said going anywhere under is not a possibility and that it would "certainly" hurt the city's goals.

A concern was brought forward about trash fitting into the toters during the holidays, which the commissioner said would be a good time to utilize the residential drop-off at the transfer station or the household could request a second bin for a few months.

"The transfer station being, in my opinion, the preferred way when you only generate, on occasion, more than what fits," he said.

Earlier this month, the administration also held community meetings at the Ralph J. Froio Senior Center and Conte Community School.


Tags: trash,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories