image description
Homeowners on Barton Hill Road are worried that digging by Eversource will damage their properties, citing uncompleted work by a different utility.

Dalton Select Board Continues Eversource Public Hearing

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — A public hearing on special permit for Eversource to upgrade the utility's infrastructure was continued last week for a third time because of concerns expressed by residents of Barton Hill Road.
 
The public hearing was opened on March 11 under the agenda item "Pole Relocation Request" but was continued because a representative from Eversouce was not present to answer questions from residents. 
 
During the April 8 Select Board meeting, the hearing was reopened, during which it was clarified that the initial paperwork stating that the hearing was for poles to be installed was incorrect.
 
The electric company had actually submitted an application for a special permit to install underground conduits and cables in front of 126 and 170 Barton Hill Road. 
 
Barton Hill residents were worried about the location of the underground splice pits and questioned the impact the excavation would have on their properties.  
 
Eversource line worker apprentice Brandon Owen clarified at the April meeting that the utility will carve out a silo in front of each of the properties along the road edge on the town taking land.
 
The work would not cut the sidewalks or road, Owen said. The contractors will be using Digsafe "and trench as best they can within town taking to install a more reliable upgraded infrastructure" of the street. 
 
The new infrastructure is an upgrade to the current system, which will be abandoned, making it safer and more reliable for the neighborhood, Owen said. 
 
If there is an outage it is usually only minutes because contractors typically dig alongside the existing infrastructure and then install the new conduit and the new wire, he said. 
 
This would likely be a multi-day process, but he said the only interruption residents can expect is when Eversourse discontinues the existing infrastructure and switches it over to the new one. 
 
Customers are notified when an expected outage occurs, and if the outage lasts for an extended period, Eversouce offers generation for the affected customers while the work is being done, he said. 
 
One resident said they do not understand why a project like this is necessary as they have not had any issues with their power.
 
There has been an influx of solar, and the current system is outdated so, the load is getting pushed back onto the grid, and the existing infrastructure can't reliably handle what is currently in the ground, Owen said. 
 
The splice pit was proposed to be placed directly in front of 126 Barton Hill Road, which residents objected to as it would be an eyesore and can not have anything grow on it. 
 
"Why this point was chosen is because it's a new point to make an L for when we're pulling in that primary infrastructure. The longer that cable gets, the harder it is to pull," Owen said. 
 
"So, we pick a midpoint, if you think of an L or a T. It, unfortunately, got to be right in the middle there so that we can pull through and then pull up the street." 
 
The Select Board voted to continue the public hearing until May 13 and requested that Eversouce provide an updated plan that included a timeline duration so residents know what to expect for the interruption of the street.
 
In addition to that, board members requested a site inspection to determine if there are any less-intrusive locations.
 
Around the first week of May, Owen did a site visit to show residents where the digging was going to take place, Executive Assistant Alyssa Maschino said afterward.
 
Owen also coordinated with the residents of 126 and 170 Barton Hill to find a location in front of their homes and found an agreed-upon area in each yard, she said. 
 
During the public hearing on May 13, residents reiterated some of their concerns, mainly the impact the excavation would have on their yards, and requested that Eversource provide written plans to show the new location of the splice pits.
 
They provided previous examples of excavation work that Spectrum had done and left unfinished. The residents said they had to fill it in after multiple failed attempts to reach someone from Spectrum to come and fix it. 
 
The board directed the residents to contact Town Manager Thomas Hutcheson with complaints about Spectrum's work. 
 
The work that the Eversource contractors will be doing will be right alongside that, Owen said. "So, our contractors will definitely do a much better job at reseeding and cleaning up." 
 
Owen said he can't speak for Spectrum, but Eversource, as far as he knows, also communicates better with its customers. 
 
During the May 13 public hearing, residents thanked Owen for working with them and said they appreciated the collaboration to find a compromise. 
 
The new location "is a good spot," one resident said. 
 
"I'm happy we could come to a compromise that's less invasive to you folks," Owen said.
 
The public hearing was postponed to June 10 to allow Eversource to submit a finalized detailed work plan and timeline.
 
The board said if the permit is approved, it will include the condition that the area be properly reseeded, and an inspection by a town official will have to be done following the work. 

Tags: eversource,   infrastructure improvements,   public utility,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories