Pittsfield Council Endorses 11 Departmental Budgets

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City Council last week preliminarily approved 11 department budgets in under 90 minutes on the first day of fiscal year 2025 hearings.

Mayor Peter Marchetti has proposed a $216,155,210 operating budget, a 5 percent increase from the previous year.  After the council supported a petition for a level-funded budget earlier this year, the mayor asked each department to come up with a level-funded and a level-service-funded spending plan.

"The budget you have in front of you this evening is a responsible budget that provides a balance between a level service and a level-funded budget that kept increases to a minimum while keeping services that met the community's expectations," he said.

Marchetti outlined four major budget drivers: More than $3 million in contractual salaries for city and school workers; a $1.5 million increase in health insurance to $30.5 million; a more than  $887,000 increase in retirement to nearly $17.4 million; and almost $1.1 million in debt service increases.

"These increases total over $6 million," he said. "To cover these obligations, the city and School Committee had to make reductions to be within limits of what we can raise through taxes."

The city expects to earn about $115 million in property taxes in FY25 and raise the remaining amount through state aid and local receipts. The budget proposal also includes a $2.5 million appropriation from free cash to offset the tax rate and an $18.5 million appropriation from the water and sewer enterprise had been applied to the revenue stream.

"Our government is not immune to rising costs to impact each of us every day," Marchetti said. "Many of our neighbors in surrounding communities are also facing increases in their budgets due to the same factors."

He pointed to other Berkshire communities' budgets, including a 3.5 percent increase in Adams and a 12 percent increase in Great Barrington. Pittsfield rests in the middle at a 5.4 percent increase.



"I want to make it clear that I think some people misunderstood us when we passed our original petition to ask the mayor to come to as close to level funding as possible taking in all considerations," Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren said.

"We were very successful in what we were doing. We were asking the mayor to focus very closely and I think he did."

He said the council was "spoiled" this year, as the mayor has had several channels of communication with the council, the public, and the media leading up to the budget proposal.

"So I think we're going to have more public involvement and communication on this budget."

Mayor's Office

The Mayor's Office budget of $261,816 was preliminarily approved with little discussion.  It is a $6,019, or 2.35 percent, increase from the previous year.

In his first year in office, Marchetti has proposed three percent raises for himself and the director of administrative services.

Account Name 2021 Approval 2022 Approval 2023 Approval 2024 Approval 2025 Approval
Mayor $100,915 $102,428 $110,000 $115,725 $119,313
Director of Admin Services $59,554 $62,889 $67,605 $70,000 $72,170
Executive Assistant $42,125 $46,516 $50,004 $53,872 $54,133
Markets and Advertising $300 $125 $125 $200 $200
Supplies $2,575 $2,575 $2,450 $2,500 $2,500
Travel $1,000 $0 0 $1,000 $1,000
MA Municipal Association $11,200 $11,500 $11,500 $12,500 $12,500
Total $216,669 $225,908 $242,784 $255,797 $261,816

City Council

The City Council budget of $109,262 was preliminary approved with some discussion.  It is the same as last year's budget.

Councilor at Large Kathy Amuso unsuccessfully motioned to reduce the education and training line by $1,620, which partly funds attendance at the Massachusetts Municipal Association conference.

"I feel like all the departments, not all but many of the departments, seem to make a sacrifice and I think the City Council needs to make a sacrifice," she said.

Amuso was the lone vote in support of the amendment.

Councilor at Large Earl Persip III feels that the small fee to educate councilors and take advantage of networking once a year is "kind of important."

"I don't want to limit someone's options to be able to participate in this because some people may be able to afford to go on their own, some people may not," he said.

"I don't want to limit people who run and do things for City Council because they can't afford to come be part of the conversation so I won't support that."

Warren agreed, saying the conferences have been beneficial, adding that the council has done more in six months than he has seen the body do in years.

"I think the investment is well worth it," he said.

Account Name 2021 Approval 2022 Approval 2023 Approval 2024 Approval 2025 Approval
Councilors $90,002 $90,002 $90,002 $90,002 $90,002
Clerk of the City Council $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000
Clerk of Committees $8,640 $8,640 $8,640 $8,640 $8,640
Education and Training $2,420 $2,420 $4,620 $4,620 $4,620
Advertising/Marketing $1,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000
Total $106,062 $107,062 $109,262 $109,262 $109,262

Veterans

The Veterans Services budget of $826,869 was preliminarily approved with little discussion. It is a $45,823, or 5.25 percent, decrease from the previous year largely due to a $50,000 savings in the program expense.

Account Name 2021 Approval 2022 Approval 2023 Approval 2024 Approval 2025 Approval
Veterans' Agent $53,657 $55,312 $59,460 $62,433 $64,358
Administrative Assistant $33,243 $33,742 $34,248 $37,259 $39,511
Equipment Maintenance $842 $1,400 $1,500 $1,750 $1,750
Rental Expense $6,500 $6,500 $6,500 $6,500 $6,500
Flags $8,600 $8,600 $11,000 $12,000 $12,000
Supplies $3,000 $2,000 $2,500 $2,500 $2,500
Program Expense $900,000 $900,000 $800,000 $750,000 $700,000
Award and Declarations $300 $250 $250 $250 $250
Total $1,005,650 $1,007,804 $915,458 $872,692 $826,869

City Clerk

The City Clerk's budget of $436,540 was preliminarily approved with little discussion. It is a $28,315, or 6.94 percent, increase from the previous year.

City Clerk Michele Benjamin said some of the line items have gone down because there were three elections to budget for last year and only two this year. There is a proposed significant increase in election workers' pay.

"With early voting in 2020, we had 12,000 people early vote and we only had 10,000 go to the polls so we basically had two elections," Benjamin said.

The council at its meeting last week approved her petition to bump election workers' pay by $5 per hour. This is not included in the proposal.

Account Name 2021 Approval 2022 Approval 2023 Approval 2024 Approval 2025 Approval
City Clerk $72,514 $75,825 $81,511 $87,941 $90,667
Assistant City Clerk $42,056 $43,627 $45,499 $48,440 $51,088
Head Clerk $38,969 $39,706 $40,301 $35,485 $37,425
Assistant Clerk Registrar $34,754 $39,706 $40,332 $48,559 $51,760
Election Officers $26,656 $22,935 $24,696 $35,280 $55,752
Secretary Board $32,229 $33,741 $35,189 $35,485 $36,423
Senior Clerk Typist $35,923 $37,609 $34,247 $35,485 $37,425
Election Custodians $3,000 $2,800 $2,800 $4,200 $3,200
Equipment Maintenance $6,471 $7,173 $6,775 $6,850 $6,900
Election Programming $6,000 $9,000 $6,000 $9,000 $6,600
Rental Expense $700 $700 $500 $700 $600
Education $1,000 $600 $800 $800 $1,200
Advertising & Marketing $500 $2,000 $2,500 $2,500 $2,500
City Code Updates $10,000 $8,000 $8,000 $10,000 $10,000
Record Preservation $2,000 $2,000 $6,000 $5,000 $5,000
Supplies $16,500 $23,000 $16,500 $23,000 $19,000
Census $15,000 $16,000 $18,000 $19,500 $21,000
Total $344,272 $363,082 $369,650 $408,225 $436,540

 

Council on Aging

The Council on Aging budget of $411,103 was preliminarily approved without discussion. It is a $19,061, or 4.86 percent increase from the previous year due to contractual obligations.

Account Name 2021 Approval 2022 Approval 2023 Approval 2024 Approval 2025 Approval
Director $61,221 $64,240 $69,057 $74,686 $77,002
Senior Clerk Typist $34,251 $34,898 $34,115 $36,460 $38,453
Admin Assistant/Supervisor $28,084 $34,895 $37,513 $39,233 $40,605
Soc Serv Tech/Custodian $29,267 $30,640 $36,876 $38,667 $40,780
Soc Serv Tech/Custodian (PT) $28,240 $34,546 $38,090 $37,919 $41,026
Program Assistant $35,055 $39,463 $41,181 $44,369 $47,298
Activities Leaders (PT) $11,202 $33,218 $33,330 $38,472 $41,026
Kitchen Coordinator $23,860 $15,600 $18,093 $19,236 $20,513
Temp. Labor $3,485 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000
Equipment Maintenance $6,300 $6,300 $7,656 $6,900 $6,900
Building Maintenance $14,000 $15,000 $17,691 $21,000 $22,400
Printing $1,000 $1,000 $1,179 $1,200 $1,200
Supplies $2,500 $2,500 $2,948 $3,000 $3,000
Program Expense $23,900 $23,900 $28,325 $25,900 $25,900
Total $302,365 $341,200 $371,055 $392,042 $411,103

Human Resources

The Human Resources budget of $273,374 was preliminarily approved with little discussion. It is a $15,163, 5.87 percent, increase from the previous year.

Account Name 2021 Approval 2022 Approval 2023 Approval 2024 Approval 2025 Approval
Director of Human Resources $76,951 $90,430 $97,212 $105,135 $108,395
Human Resources Specialist $44,654 $48,452 $52,086 $56,126 $59,829
Training $13,500 $13,500 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000
Educational Opportunity $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
City Physician/ Medical Services $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000
Online Application Program $5,600 $5,600 $9,750 $9,750 $9,750
Stipend Language Prof $3,000 $3,000 $6,500 $16,200 $18,900
Diversity and Inclusion $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 - -
Postage $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Supplies $3,500 $3,500 $3,500 $3,500 $4,000
Assessment Centers $19,500 $19,500 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000
Recruitment and Retention - $3,000 $5,000 $7,500 $12,500
Total $201,705 $218,982 $234,048 $258,211 $273,374

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion

The DEI budget of $186,502 was preliminarily approved with little discussion. It is a $4,648, or 2.56 percent increase from the previous year.

Amuso queried Chief Diversity Officer Michael Obasohan about the $3,000 increase for professional development.

"Now there are more conferences that focus on equity and inclusion and justice that we can attend," he said. "There are a lot more of our employees that would like to attend these conferences."

The councilor also asked if there was any way that the office could work on the school side, as Obasohan is limited to some meetings within the district about equity and discrimination.

"Is there collaboration on the budget that we could have? That's what I'm looking at," she said.

Marchetti said "anything is possible" but it comes down to "what is the role?"

"I know that in my short term in office, [Obasohan] has assisted me with a school-based issue and that's me, I know there are others," he explained.

"But I think if we're going to look for one person to provide diversity equity, and inclusion for all the employees of the city, all the employees of the school department, and 5,200 children, I'm not sure that that's feasible with one person."

Councilor at Large Alisa Costa said there are many people that the department serves, adding "I appreciate the scope of the work that you're doing."

Account Name 2021 Approval 2022 Approval 2023 Approval 2024 Approval 2025 Approval
Chief Diversity Officer - $51,610 $89,803 $96,650 $99,647
Administrative Assistant - $18,250 $47,213 $52,304 $55,755
DEI Ambassadors - $8,400 $8,400 $8,400 $9,600
Contractual Services - $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
Recruitment and Retention - $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $0
Professional Development - $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $8,000
Supplies - $1,000 $3,000 $3,000 $1,500
Travel & Dues - $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000
Total - $99,760 $169,416 $181,854 $186,502

Airport

The Pittsfield Municipal Airport budget of $338,352 was preliminarily approved with some discussion.  It is a $27,137, or 8.72 percent, increase from the previous year.

Persip queried Airport Manager Daniel Shearer on the $12,000 increase in utilities, which is related an increase in the supply rate, and Amuso had questions about the department's city vehicles.

 

Account Name 2021 Approval 2022 Approval 2023 Approval 2024 Approval 2025 Approval
Airport Manager $62,445 $66,265 $71,235 $76,667 $79,044
Assistant Airport Manager $51,566 $54,768 $58,876 $63,423 $67,607
Airport Inspector $41,396 $45,623 $49,045 $52,853 $56,329
Scheduled Overtime $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
Commission Clerk $1,872 $1,872 $1,872 $1,872 $1,872
Contractual Services $12,000 $12,000 $10,000 $10,000 $13,000
Utilities $55,000 $55,000 $50,000 $50,000 $62,000
Telephone $2,200 $2,200 $2,000 $2,000 --
Maintenance $28,000 $28,000 $28,000 $30,000 $30,000
Snow Removal $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 --
Education & Training $0 $0 $3,000 $2,700 $5,000
Membership and Dues $1,500 $1,500 $700 $1,200 1,500
Supplies $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 $4,000
Equipment -- $0 $5,000 $3,000 $3,000
Total $273,479 $284,728 $297,228 $311,215 $333,352

 

 

 


Tags: fiscal 2025,   pittsfield_budget,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories