image description
The City Council voted to make parking free for veterans with plates or who register with the city effective June 1.

Pittsfield Says 'Thank You' to Veterans with Free Parking

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — City officials have decided to thank veterans for their service with free parking starting June 1.

The City Council on Tuesday approved an ordinance allowing veterans to park in municipal lots and spaces at no charge. This was brought forward by Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren, Ward 4 Councilor James Conant, and Ward 5 Councilor Patrick Kavey.

The original proposal was for veterans with designated plates but to ensure equity, it was amended to allow veterans with regular plates to register with the city for free parking. Warren came to the meeting with an amended proposal after suggestions were made during a subcommittee meeting last month.

"This is the same ordinance that we petitioned for. It was mentioned that the Committee on Ordinance and Rules two things," he said.

"One, they wanted to move this along as quickly as possible and two, there's going to be a provision for registration with the city in a way that's going to be proposed and implemented so this covers both. Either veterans plates or registration will be able to use parking for free for veterans."

City Solicitor Stephen Pagnotta said the amendment is "unusual," as there is not yet a system to register veterans' license plates.

"The rest of the ordinance is not a problem approving it," he said. "This particular provision can't be implemented until a system has been approved. If the City Council wants to move ahead as it is now, just you should recognize that we don't know what that system is yet."

Commissioner of Public Services and Utilities Ricardo Morales recommended leaving free parking to veterans' plates, explaining that it could be burdensome for veterans with regular plates to have to register with the city.

"The reason for that was because certain people pay the additional amount of money to the state to get 'veteran' on their plates," Kavey explained.

"What about the veterans that don't pay that extra fee? They should also get free parking."

Morales confirmed that the city is capable of registering plates into its system so that registered veterans cannot be flagged. He suggested having a system where the plates can be taken off the list.

At first, there were differing views on the amendment, with some thinking it was clunky and sloppy, but everyone agreed by the end of the conversation and voted in favor.  Ward 6 Councilor Dina Lampiasi was absent.

The effective date was also pushed out a few weeks.

"I love this idea in concept but as we're hearing, the more I think about it the clunkier it gets. So does the vehicle have to be registered to the veteran themselves? Could it be if that person is disabled and somebody else is driving them everywhere does that person get to register?" Councilor at Large Alisa Costa said.


"It seems like a lot of complications for that benefit and I don't know where I stand on this particular ordinance at the moment but I'm not comfortable saying that this shall take effect upon its passage because then tomorrow someone could walk into the city and say, 'I want to register,' and we don't have the means to do that. So I think we either need to change the effective date or wait until we can get a clear ordinance. It just seems a little tough to implement and enforce."

She later made a friendly amendment for the ordinance to take effect on June 1.

"This is kind of sloppy, so let's just make it simple. If we approve just the veteran plates tonight, I'm on board, and then you work out everything else after the fact but it seems very sloppy," Councilor at Large Earl Persip III said.

"It seems like it's not ready. If you just want to say a veteran plate gets free parking starting tomorrow, I'm for it. Anything beyond that it's too sloppy."

Warren said he didn't care how it went through, as he just wanted to get it going so people can use it.  He apologized for the alleged sloppiness, explaining that he wrote the amendment that day.

"I think the concept of this is ideal. Of course, they should have free parking, no doubt about it in my mind," Ward 7 Councilor Rhonda Serre said.

"Identifying them as the hard part and if you're gonna go with veterans plates, there's an equity problem there for the people that can afford to buy veterans plates through the Mass registry. It should be equally accessible to all veterans, whether they can afford to buy a special plate or not."

Serre also originally favored the unrevised petition for the sake of moving it forward. Persip agreed about the equity issue and that there is a "rush to get something on the books."

"I think it's easy enough to just say a veteran comes in and shows documentation and gives their plate and they can be added in," Councilor at Large Kathy Amuso said.

Mayor Peter Marchetti said this is a "very simple solution."

"We have a Department of Veterans Services. We can complete a form that requires all the same information that all of you guys filled out when you were first elected to the City Council that has your name and your license plate number. The Department of Veteran Services can get the information to the commissioner, we can put it in there in the plate scanners," he said.

"It's a very simple process that could take us 10 minutes tomorrow morning to figure out our thing, although I would suggest that you amend the language to say that it takes place in two weeks so that two things can happen. Number one, we can inform the public of what we're doing because not everybody's home watching a meeting, and then two, it gives us a little bit of time to get our process down."

Costa said the point was well taken and that the conversation put her mind at ease.  Serre took a similar stance, reversing her opposition to the amendment.


Tags: parking,   veterans,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories