image description
Ward 2 candidates Brittany Bandani and Alex Blumin take questions from moderator Bob Heck at Monday's debate.

Pittsfield's Wards 2 and 3 Candidates Take Questions

By Brittany Polito & Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Ward 3 candidate Matthew Wrinn had the time to himself when opponent William Tyer was unable to attend.

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Three of the candidates in two wards showed up for a set of debates on Monday night at Berkshire Community College.

The debates, the first two that night, were hosted by Pittsfield Community Television in collaboration with iBerkshires.com. Bob Heck of PCTV was the moderator for both debates.

The Ward 2 debate started off rocky when candidate Alexander Blumin was late. Candidate Brittany Bandani had the first minutes to herself before Blumin arrived to take his seat.

The questions focused on infrastructure, finances, budgeting, employee residence, the actions of current Councilor Charles Kronick, and how involved each will be in the council.

Bandani is a newcomer to Pittsfield and to politics, which she said is a good thing for residents.

"As a newcomer, I'm not set in my ways. I'm ready to listen. As a practicing attorney, I understand the power that comes from careful consideration of all the facts and diligent decision-making. I do not come before you to promise that I'm going to completely change the city but I do promise that I know how to work in collaboration with others to achieve unified long-term goals," she said.

"My proposal to you is this: let's get back to basics."

She feels that much of local governance relies on simple questions about money, the community's needs, safety, business, and making the city a desirable place to live. Bandani said she does not pretend to have the answers but is prepared to have conversations and do the work.

Blumin is running to represent homeowners, business owners, and taxpayers in the city, promising that he will listen to the constituents of his ward before anyone else. He moved to the United States from Ukraine in the 1990s and is now a landlord for low-income and disabled tenants.

"I would like to bring power back to residents," he said. "We should make decisions, not special interest groups."

The candidate feels that the city's fiscal 2024 budget increase of nearly 9 percent is unprecedented and asked that voters choose wisely.

Before her opponent arrived, Bandani answered questions about economic development on Tyler Street and policing in the downtown. She stressed the importance of making commerce accessible in the corridor and making it a welcoming place to be.

On the financial end, she said there are grants and tax incentives to utilize but the city also has to be mindful of excessive code requirements that slow development.

"First and foremost, the financial aspect, making it usable for businesses to come here. Secondly, making Pittsfield a place people want to stay. It's one thing for people to come and be here for a year and then bounce. We don't want that. We want long-term talent here so that we can develop wealth, especially downtown, especially on Tyler Street," Bandani said.

"Part of that is cleaning up Pittsfield, making sure it's safe, making sure if people want to go out at night and want to go in and do things. We need more things for people to do so I think overall, making sure incentives are there and making sure that people want to be here and want to stay here is our most important priority."

She does not necessarily agree that the city needs more policing downtown but is not opposed. The candidate believes that there needs to be a focus on access to resources for people with mental health issues.

"Addiction is not a problem that can be solved overnight," she said. "So if people are struggling with that, especially downtown, then you need to focus on resources and resource availability."

Bandani sees a need for consistency in the Police Department, as it is currently under-resourced.  

"We need new talent to come in. We need people who are ready to work. I know what things like mandatory overtime, it's costing the city a lot of money so we need good candidates to come here and work in the city," she said.

The two candidates were asked if they agreed with Kronick's sometimes controversial motions during his tenure, one being his charter objection that derailed the fiscal year 2023 budget approval.

Bandani appreciated Kronick and Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren's efforts to request an audit for city and federal funds. She said in an ideal world, the city could do whatever it wants with American Rescue Plan Act funds, a focus of the audits after a discrepancy was found, but that is not the case because there are specific limitations to how it can be spent.


Blumin said people need to stop attacking Kronick and that he is a good councilor.

"Sometimes he makes mistakes. We've all seen them, however, let's get to the bottom of the issue," he said, explaining that he supports the audit of the ARPA spending.

Blumin said inequality between Precincts A and B is the most pressing issue in Ward 2.

"And definitely we have other issues like roads, like crime," he said. "Specifically where I live the area is saturated with homeless people, with certain people who commit crimes and that's a serious problem for Ward 2."

Bandani said infrastructure would be a top priority, citing the state of roads and sidewalks throughout the ward.

Matthew Wrinn had the Ward 3 debate all to himself when his opponent William Tyer was unable to participate.

Bandani was questioned about her lack of a website or social media campaign page. She apologized to voters for not making that effort but said she planned on holding constituent hours if elected. Blumin, a frequent attendee and speaker at City Council meetings asked why he had never seen her there. Bandani said she watches the meetings from home and takes notes. 

He said he was ready to work with other councilors and the incoming mayor and pledged transparency if elected to succeed Kevin Sherman.

With a background in criminal justice, he's focused on public safety and, in terms of ward issues, he's heard from residents about flooding concerns and the recent installation of large speed bumps on a few streets in the ward.

"If the residents on this street want to slow down the traffic, it's a good thing. But let's figure out a way to do it," he said. "They're gaudy. They're ugly. They're gonna be problematic."

Wrinn said he'd support the pilot program on other routes used as speedways and would work with the city to find solutions for better pedestrian safety, especially for children walking to school.

He'll also be focused on the use of tax dollars "because I'm in the same boat as a taxpayer" stretching the dollars every month.

"I wouldn't say wasteful, but I think it could do better," Wrinn said of the budgeting process. "I think there's other ways to save money for taxpayers. Help the people in the city."

He is for the investment in historic Wahconah Park, seeing it as an opportunity to bring in revenue with games and tournaments. Bringing people into the city means they'll be spending money in businesses and restaurants and staying at hotels.

"Obviously it's wishful thinking but that's something that I am passionate about," he said.

He stood by his statement that he would have voted "100 percent" to continue mosquito spraying. "I'd say that the risk of mosquito-borne illness is higher than the potential to spray," Wrinn said.

He declined to be "pigeonholed" into supporting either mayoral candidate and thought that most of the councilors in this term had the best interests of the taxpayers but added, "I don't think that they all made the best decisions every time."

He thought the meetings were often chaotic and unorganized, and that the work of the council wasn't getting done because of the arguing.

No matter who's in office, he said, voters hope "they're going to do the best decision and make the best choices for the voters in the city."
 

Debates for Wards 6 and 7 and for mayor will be held Wednesday, Nov. 1, also at Berkshire Community College. Look for the full debates on PCTV
 

Tags: debate,   election 2023,   


If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories