image description
The owner of Sibaritas is opening a new restaurant, 'Aura,' in the former Jay Allen's on North Street.

Sibaritas Owner Plans Second Resturaunt at 41 North

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The owner of Sibaritas plans to open a new restaurant in the former Jay Allen's Clubhouse Grille. 

On Monday, the Licensing Board approved a change of category, a change of corporate name, a change of corporate structure, and a change of name for 41 North St.  

Attorney Darren Lee, representing the applicant, explained that Sibaritas owner Megan Gomez is opening a second restaurant in the large, empty restaurant space next to Hot Harry's. 

Gomez is now the 100 percent owner of Sibaritas, he reported, as well as the new venture. The "doing business as" name on the application is "Aura." 

The location most recently housed Placita Latina Salvadoran and Mexican Cuisine, which moved to 17 Wendell Ave. Ext. Jay Allen's closed before the pandemic. 

The attorney wasn't able to share much about the upcoming business, but noted that Gomez works "quite a bit" and will be able to balance the nearby eateries.  

Sibaritas, an Italian restaurant with a Chilean flair, opened in 2021 in the former Elizabeth's Restaurant at 1264 East St. In 2024, the Licensing Board approved a new annual downtown all-alcohol restaurant license for the eatery's new location at 27 McKay St., the former Trattoria Rustica. 

Sibaritas remains in that location. 

This left the former beer and wine license active for 1264 East St., and when the eatery owners learned that they could upgrade it to a full liquor license under a new state law, they opted to transfer and upgrade it for 41 North St. 

"That's the reason for the many changes you see on the application, which includes location, type of license, which we just understand is available from the city to convert that," Lee said. 

Next to 41 North Street, the Marketplace Cafe closed last month after 15 years in business. 

While there was positive news about a restaurant space being filled in North Street, that wasn't the case for the former Chili's in Berkshire Crossing


The restaurant closed abruptly in August 2024 and has been looking for a buyer for over a year. The current lease agreement goes out to 2029, and the company, Pepper Dining Inc., is looking for another business to carry it out.

Last fall, Chair Thomas Campoli reminded the company that under state law, if a licensee is not operating, the board has to "turn up the heat" to see if the license can be transferred or the venue reopened under a different owner. 

"As far as I'm told, we have nothing new to really add," Director of Northeast Operations Allen Anderson reported. 

"We have no interested buyers, still for sale, but nothing new to report, as far as the status of that restaurant." 

He explained that there were some interested parties early on, but as of that morning, there is no active interest. The company is reportedly doing "very, very" well in other areas, but didn't work out in Pittsfield. 

The update on the status of the shuttered restaurant's all-alcohol license was again continued. 

"Right now, I don't want to do anything with the license, so I think we should just continue this," board member Kathy Amuso said. 

Anderson explained that when one of these restaurants is closed, they look at the volume of guests, how difficult it is to staff, and proximity to other restaurants.  

"This one doesn't have much going for us," he said. 

"No other restaurants around it, super difficult to staff, management was impossible to find." 

Campoli pointed out that if a liquor license is rescinded because of inactivity, the city loses that license.  He pointed out that the license could be sold on its own, apart from the building, so it remains available for another business. 

The board also asked that a representative from Chili's legal or real estate department update the board on the progress of the sale and if the liquor license could be put on the market. 


Tags: license board,   alcohol license,   restaurants,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Planning Deliberates Sign & STR Bylaws

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Planning Board is a step closer to finishing draft bylaws for short-term rentals (STR) and signage to be voted at the annual town meeting.

The planners took up the bylaws  after contentious interpretations by the town of the existing signage bylaw and over the lack of STR regulations. 

They started work on the drafts in February but some elements were tabled for this month's meeting, held last week. 

They first rewrote the parking at a rental to three or more rooms must have three spaces and two or fewer rooms having two spots.

The board debated on the definition section, which was tabled last month. After some deliberation, members decided to remove a requirement for all short-term rentals to prominently display signage containing the owners' name, property address, 24-hour contact information for the property manager, and legal occupancy limit of the building.

Member Joe Trybus argued that the enforcer, Building Commissioner Brian Duval, should be the contact and that owners shouldn't have their information out there for anyone to contact.

They also discussed the registration and inspection sections, rewording and adding some language to state: All operators of short-term rentals shall register with the town clerk, who shall maintain a registry of all approved STRs in the town of Lanesborough, and may set reasonable fees for maintenance of registry applications for registrations shall include the following, owner name and property address, local property management and contact information, copy of currently valid STR certificate of registration with Massachusetts Department of Revenue, copy of current valid certificate of inspection from the building commissioner.

Chair Courtney Dondi said she agreed the town should be the one to decide on the fees.

The members debated how they should write the ownership and entity limits. Trybus argued that non-owner occupied buildings would be limited to one STR in a residential zone while Leanne Yinger thought it should be based on units, not the building.

The board determined an owner-occupied property in a residential zone could rent all units on that property short-term, though there were  couple no votes on this.

It also finished the purpose and intent section stating: This section regulates short-term rentals, STRs of residential properties in a way that clarifies where these uses are allowed in Lanesborough and regulates them in a manner that retains the character and safety of neighborhoods and the community while preserving an important resource for the local tourism dependent business community. 

Members plan to review these new changes with the expectation of finalizing them on April 13.

The board had also discussed signage bylaws at the last meeting and completed language on the sizes and limits.

There will be one banner per business that must be attached to the building. The total banner area must not exceed 25 percent of the street-facing façade. 

Open, closed, and  menu signs will be explicitly allowed as part of normal business signage and businesses can only have one sandwich board (A-frame) sign. These will be a max of 36 inches high and a max 12 square foot of the total area.

One feather flag would be allowed per business with a maximum size of 12-feet high and 3-feet wide. Inflatable tube men will not be allowed.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories