Letter: Dalton Police Budget for Special Town Meeting

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

I have immense respect for the work performed by our Police Department. It is certainly a great comfort for the town's people that they can feel safe. However, reviewing the police budget was still necessary and appropriate to assure the townspeople that the department's budget was the best it could be. The Finance Committee did not target the police budget; instead, all departments underwent the same objective process. The misinformation presented by the Police Department at the May 19 Select Board meeting was very unfortunate.

Each year Dalton, town departments submit their anticipated budgets to the Select Board for the next fiscal year, based on current spending, expected salary increases and any anticipated new expenses. After preliminary approval of these budgets by the Select Board, the Finance Committee reviews prior-year spending and justifications for increases, aiming to limit tax increases. This process is applied consistently to all departments, including the Police Department.

This year, the Police Department submitted a budget of $1,664,924, an 8.4 percent increase. With a history of the police budget having significant money remaining at the end of the budget year, and with this year's budget projected by the town manager to rise significantly, it was appropriate that the police budget, like all other budgets, would have excesses trimmed to help the people of the town get some tax relief.

The surplus amounts in the police budget returned to free cash over the past few years are as follows:

  Salary  Expenses  Total
2022 $45,0715 $25,542 $70,612
2023  $42,485 $19,626  $62,112
2024 $88,615  $25,234 $113,938
2025      $100,000+ (estimated)


 
  

 

 

 

 

During deliberations prior to the annual town meeting, the Finance Committee trimmed the police budget by $14,500 and approved the budget. At the annual town meeting, people with knowledge of Dalton Police procedures and costs presented potential budget cuts. The voters rejected the budget proposed on May 5.

With this information, the Finance Committee is ready for an additional review of excesses, not core funding of officers, the DARE program, the comfort dog, the town's K-9 or the crossing guard as mentioned in the recent news articles.

This process might save an additional $50,000 to $60,000, which I believe the town's struggling taxpayers would appreciate.

Normally when a budget is rejected by the voters at an annual town meeting, the rejected budget is reviewed by the Finance Committee prior to a revote at a special town meeting. Such a review is supported by the Dalton Finance bylaw, 97-2&3. I am concerned the Select Board at their May 19 meeting voted to skip this step and scheduled the original police budget for a town vote on June 9.

I believe the town's taxpayers should demand a Finance Committee review prior to a revote. If you share my concern, please express your views to the Select Board at their next meeting on May 27. Also, please plan to attend the special annual town meeting in June to assure that the appropriate police budget is adopted for Dalton.

William Drosehn
Dalton, Mass. 

Drosehn is chair of the Dalton Finance Committee. 

 

 

 

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Council OKs Underground Fiber Network

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — More underground fiber internet cables will be installed in Pittsfield. 

On Tuesday, the City Council approved Gateway Fiber's request to install an underground fiber network infrastructure within the city's right-of-way.  

The company was given the go-ahead for an aerial network last year alongside Archtop Fiber, marking the beginning of construction with a ribbon-cutting at the Colonial Theatre. Gateway Fiber will offer subscription plans ranging from $65 to $150 per month, depending on speed. 

Wards 3 and 4 will see the most work in the first phase, according to an underground fiber deployment plan.  Fourteen streets in Ward 4 will see underground fiber deployment; 13 streets in Ward 3.  

Ward 4 Councilor James Conant voted in opposition for personal reasons, as he signed up for Gateway Fiber briefly last year and said he had poor service and poor communication from the company. 

Some councilors and community members appreciated bringing competition to Spectrum internet services. Ward 5 Councilor Patrick Kavey pointed out that it costs about $90 per month for 500 megabytes per second with Spectrum, and that all three fiber services that have come to Pittsfield are cheaper. 

Operations Manager Jennifer Sharick explained that they were seeking approval for underground fiber deployment as part of the next phase in Pittsfield. The city was found to be a "very" viable community for underground fiber. 

Gateway Fiber, she said, originally served a community of 250 residents outside of St. Louis, Mo. 

"Following the pandemic, we saw the need, and what people need for fiber and reliable internet service to bring residents and businesses the opportunity for connectivity," Sharick said. 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories