image description
Resident Peter May speaks to his resolution condemning dictators and monarchs and any undermining of democracy at Tuesday's City Council meeting.

North Adams Council Passes Resolution Condemning Dictators

By Tammy Daniels iBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
NORTH ADAMS, Mass. — The City Council on Tuesday endorsed a short but straightforward resolution condemning dictatorship and supporting democracy and the rule of law.
 
The resolution, presented by Councilor Ashley Shade on behalf of Peter May, passed 8-3, with Councilors Keith Bona, Peter Oleskiewicz and President Bryan Sapienza voting nay. Councilor Wayne Wilkinson was absent.
"Be it resolved, we as elected representatives of the city of North Adams, condemn the concept of an American Monarch, or Dictator and any and all policies that undermine the Constitution, the structure and function of our democracy, and the rule of law both here and across the globe."
Around two dozen people attended the council meeting and broke into applause once Shade confirmed it has passed. No one spoke against the statement but several did in favor.
 
May, given 10 minutes to explain his resolution, described democracy as being under attack and the country standing "on the precipice with one foot over the edge. There is no time to balk or pretend that it isn't happening. We are neck deep in a constitutional crisis."
 
He took aim at the actions of the Trump administration on education, health care, the courts, law firms, the media, immigrants and students.
 
"He said he doesn't know if he has to uphold the Constitution," May continued. "He is blatantly and illegally using the office of the presidency to enrich himself, taking billions in corporate and crypto bribe for access, accepting a $400 million plane, making hotel deals and much more. These aren't opinions. These are verifiable facts."
 
Shade, who motioned the resolution, said she was happy to see someone bring these issues to council.
 
"We should not have to retake an oath of office that we've already taken. But we are living in unprecedented times where executive power and authority are trampling every other branch of government," she said, adding, "this isn't about partisanship or party. I could care less who the president is, any president and any expansion of executive power, this is a threat to our constitutional republic."
 
Bona, however, felt it was, noting that while the resolution didn't speak to parties, the comments from May and others did. 
 
"We serve as a nonpartisan officials, and that choice was made by the community some point in the past to ensure that our council members aren't tied to any specific political parties," he said. "And despite what's being said tonight. It is clearly one party that's being attached. It's crucial that we approach our decisions without leaning towards red or blue, focusing instead and what's best for our community."
 
He agreed with the resolution's sentiments but said his philosophy is that the council should focus on matters that directly affect the city and its community, pointing to the recent LGBTQ resolution
 
About 30 percent of the city's voters had cast ballots for President Trump, Bona said, and this resolution "seems likely it will deepen divisions within the community, rather than foster unity." 
 
Oleskiewicz, who voted against the LGBTQ resolution, said he agreed with Bona, and that for him it was a matter of consistency in not supporting such resolutions. 
 
Councilor Andrew Fitch, who seconded the motion, said he thought the resolution was clear enough in not being about any particular person or party. 
 
"I don't think that defending the Constitution or prioritizing and listening to our residents is partisan politics," said Councilor Lisa Blackmer. "I say extraordinary times call for extraordinary measures, and I support this resolution. I don't like the wording of it too much, but I like the principle."
 
In hearing of visitors, resident Richard Dassatti said he'd studied fascism in college and "never thought that I would have to stand up and say that I'm opposed to fascism here in Massachusetts."
 
"I believe in the Constitution and our race as human beings, and against this tyranny that's unfolding right in front of us. And I ask you to support the solution that [May] presents forth," said Justin Timoney. 
 
And Christa Tinari noted, "we just said the Pledge of Allegiance to our flag. And it really stands for the rights and freedoms that we enjoy, which have to do with the shared principles of a participatory democracy."
 
Councilor Peter Breen said North Adams was a community that helps and "this is something we need to do. It's not against someone, it's for someone, your neighbors, your grandparents, your children ... We're being strangled and when we're being strangled, we're being smothered. They don't want to have any sound from us."
 
And Councilor Deanna Morrow said even though North Adams is a small city, passing a resolution like this shows "we do not agree with this, and there needs to be a change" and "that's something huge."
 
Shade said anyone not against monarchs or dictators must be living in the wrong country. 
 
"I am a big believer that our founding fathers were brilliant people who put in a system of government that had never been tried before and that has succeeded for 250 years, creating one of the most powerful and most persevering nations in the history of mankind," she said. "It is our duty to stand up and say no to tyranny in all of its forms, whether it's an executive, a monarch, a dictator or anyone who tries to take power away from the people."
 
May said there will be those who say resolutions from the City Council have no real meaning, no clout. 
 
"They're not practical because resolutions aren't laws or budgets or buildings," he said. "But I disagree ... the people of North Adams need to be reassured with this resolution that their local leaders do believe in democracy and the rule of law."

Tags: resolution,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Clarksburg Students Write in Support of Rural School Aid

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff

Mason Langenback calculated that Clarksburg would get almost $1 million if the $60 million was allocated equally.
CLARKSBURG, Mass. — Eighth-graders at Clarksburg School took a lesson in civic advocacy this week, researching school funding and writing letters to Beacon Hill that call for fully funding rural school aid. 
 
The students focused on the hardships for small rural schools and their importance to the community — that they struggle with limited funding and teacher shortages, but offer safe and supportive spaces for learning and are a hub for community connections.
 
"They all address the main issue, the funding for rural schools, and how there's a gap, and there's the $4 million gap this year, and then it's about the $40 million next year, and that rural schools need that equitable funding," said social studies teacher Mark Karhan.
 
A rural schools report in 2022 found smaller school districts cost from nearly 17 percent to 23 percent more to operate, and recommended "at least" $60 million be appropriated annually for rural school aid. 
 
Gov. Maura Healey has filed for more Chapter 70 school aid, but that often is little help to small rural schools with declining or static enrollment. For fiscal 2027, she's budgeted $20 million for rural schools, up from around $13 million this year but still far below the hoped for $60 million. 
 
Karhan said the class was broken into four groups and the students were provided a submission letter from Rural Schools Advocacy. The students used the first paragraph, which laid out the funding facts, and then did research and wrote their own letters. 
 
They will submit those with a school picture to the governor. 
 
View Full Story

More North Adams Stories