Letter: Hope, Integrity, and the Challenge of Speaking Up in Dalton

Print Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

Over the last three months, I've had the privilege of working closely with Robert Collins as he made a sincere and determined effort to address several of Dalton's long standing needs. One of the greatest gifts he offered our town was hope — hope nurtured by his refreshing, genuine willingness to listen, help and serve with integrity. His weekly office hours — a simple, transparent act of public service not seen in years — became a quiet but powerful symbol of accessibility and good governance.

Robert believes in taking the high road. He consistently avoided misinformation, personal attacks, or political theatrics, and encouraged others to do the same. It was this approach — grounded in civility and ethics — that gave many residents the confidence to come forward and speak about injustices about which they had long remained silent. Contrary to false claims made during the election, Robert did not orchestrate any smear campaign. 

Unfortunately, not everyone embraced that tone. While Robert ran a fact-based campaign, others relied on false accusations and fear to gain support. I have personally witnessed instances of coercion and have heard of the coercion used to pressure residents, including efforts to compel people to remove lawn signs supporting Robert and fellow candidate Bill Drosehn. Some supporters were intimidated into compliance, while others discovered their signs stolen under cover of night.

Also concerning were reports that individuals who do not reside in Dalton — but own property or businesses here —appeared on election day to vote for the first time. These sudden appearances raise serious questions about what inspired such actions. I can assure readers: it was not Robert or Bill who prompted them. (iBerkshires looked into this allegation and found that a few nonresidents did go to the polls but were not allowed to vote.)



As chair of Dalton's Stormwater Commission, I've directly witnessed the value of Robert's experience and insight. He has brought pragmatic solutions and saved the Commission significant time. More importantly, his continued support stands to reduce the long-term costs of upgrading our aging infrastructure — a benefit that will directly affect our tax rate.

Politics in small towns are often personal, and this election was no exception. But when we allow misinformation and intimidation to overshadow reasoned debate and respectful engagement, we all lose — regardless of who wins the vote count.

Let us hope that Robert continues to lend his talent to Dalton, especially through the Stormwater Commission and, if welcomed, the Planning Board. His presence brings reason, responsibility, and a moral compass that our community deeply needs.

Thomas B. Irwin
Dalton, Mass. 

 

 

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Council OKs Underground Fiber Network

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — More underground fiber internet cables will be installed in Pittsfield. 

On Tuesday, the City Council approved Gateway Fiber's request to install an underground fiber network infrastructure within the city's right-of-way.  

The company was given the go-ahead for an aerial network last year alongside Archtop Fiber, marking the beginning of construction with a ribbon-cutting at the Colonial Theatre. Gateway Fiber will offer subscription plans ranging from $65 to $150 per month, depending on speed. 

Wards 3 and 4 will see the most work in the first phase, according to an underground fiber deployment plan.  Fourteen streets in Ward 4 will see underground fiber deployment; 13 streets in Ward 3.  

Ward 4 Councilor James Conant voted in opposition for personal reasons, as he signed up for Gateway Fiber briefly last year and said he had poor service and poor communication from the company. 

Some councilors and community members appreciated bringing competition to Spectrum internet services. Ward 5 Councilor Patrick Kavey pointed out that it costs about $90 per month for 500 megabytes per second with Spectrum, and that all three fiber services that have come to Pittsfield are cheaper. 

Operations Manager Jennifer Sharick explained that they were seeking approval for underground fiber deployment as part of the next phase in Pittsfield. The city was found to be a "very" viable community for underground fiber. 

Gateway Fiber, she said, originally served a community of 250 residents outside of St. Louis, Mo. 

"Following the pandemic, we saw the need, and what people need for fiber and reliable internet service to bring residents and businesses the opportunity for connectivity," Sharick said. 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories