Letter: Contrast Between Parties

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

Good government is harder than it looks. Good government, like good political leadership, requires getting things done even when people fundamentally disagree, while keeping those same people on speaking terms. Good government serves all of the people, not just those who voted for it. Good government builds on laws and regulations, on debate and compromise.

Only one of our national political parties cares any more about good government. Democrats argue among themselves about particulars, but not about the goals of social justice and good government. Today's Democrats are heirs of the Roosevelts' Progressive movement — which began when the relevant Roosevelt was the Republican. They want to make the government work for the welfare of all. And not just by spending money: the last time the president submitted a balanced budget to Congress and the federal government ran a surplus, that president was a Democrat.

Good government is effective government. Speaker Nancy Pelosi could get stuff done, notably bringing home Obama's Affordable Care Act, which required working through disagreements in the Democratic caucus. They managed to do it. President Joe Biden is getting stuff done, notably the Inflation Reduction Act, infrastructure, and firearms laws — and, like President Obama, while running a no-scandal administration. There's always room for improvement, of course, but fundamentally Democrats want the government to work.


Today's Republican party does not want the government to work. Instead of passing legislation, congressional Republicans stumble leaderless through messaging stunts and irresponsible controversies about basics like honoring debts and confirming appointments. In an act of abject political cynicism, they won't even take a negotiated bipartisan "yes" for an answer to their own demands about border control.

The Republicans admit they don't want the government to solve the problem because their leader wants to demagogue it. If there is a strategy behind the bumbling chaos, it is to make the government dysfunctional, so their voters will conclude that only The Strong Man can fix it. Many of those supporters reportedly would welcome "Der Furor"  as a dictator, brushing aside mushy distractions like debate and compromise and the parts of the Constitution he finds inconvenient.

In choosing this election year between good government and chaos, we should heed the lesson of the 20th century: Fascism arrived via the ballot box. In 2024, voting for good government means voting for Democrats.

Michael Wise
Great Barrington, Mass. 

The writer is the chair of the Great Barrington Town Democratic Committee and of the Berkshire Democratic Brigades.

 

 

 

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

King and Confidantes Debate Hope and Change in 'American Five'

By Alan PetrucelliSpecial to iBerkshires
STOCKBRIDGE, Mass. — Fiction and fact meld in the regional premiere of "The American Five," now playing at the Larry Vaber Stage of the Unicorn Theatre. 
 
The play takes a fictionalized look at the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and his four closest confidants in the months leading up to the famed March on Washington on Aug. 28, 1963. The quintet, through differing opinions, animated arguments, constant threats of violence and a late-night meal featuring challah bread and wine, become a family as they prepare for the history-making march that galvanized the Civil Rights movement.
 
Most of us know the King saga. It's the second act in which playwright Chess Jakobs' genius shines. Prejudice runs rampant here: Is Stanley Levison, a Jewish lawyer from New York who shows up in Montgomery to join the fight for racial equality and "to repair the world," viewed as white? Jewish? Both? And march strategist and organizer Bayard Rustin experiences his own fight for civil rights because of his homosexuality. Here, Jakob explores prejudice on different levels.
 
The cast is top-notch with many emotional highs. As King, Rashun Carter (who would look more like his character if he had a full moustache) and Sydney Elisabeth (as Coretta Scott King) are at their best during a scene that bounces between humor and poignancy. 
 
She questions her husband about his meeting with President John F. Kennedy; he is angry and refuses to discuss it. "There is no 'you' out there, without a 'me,' in here," she says, leading King to agree that because of her self-worth and unwavering devotion to him, she is "Coretta Scott Queen."
 
As Clarence Jones, King's personal counsel, Brett Diggs has assurance and dignity; Harry Smith's portrayal of lawyer Stanley Levison, is nothing short of extraordinary. Destan Owens' performance as gay Bayard Rustin is the play's most outstanding performance as he defends his relations with men: "You don't get to judge me!" he tells King. "I'm just trying to find love."
 
"The American Five" is tightly directed by Gerry McIntyre; the historic period projections and footage/designed by Alex Hill remind people that there are dreams, such as hope and change, that are still being fought.
 
View Full Story

More South Berkshire Stories