Letter: Mobile, Trailer, Modular, Stick Built — What Is It?

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

It was abundantly clear before, during, and after the Williamstown town meeting on Tuesday night, that there is an erroneous understanding of the distinction between mobile, manufactured, and modular homes resulting in most people confusing manufactured with modular.

The name "mobile homes" was a simple name change to make this type of home seem better and preferable to what they were originally called, "trailers."

Trailers, like mobile homes, were living units built on a chassis with wheels making them easily movable over the highway.

As time progressed and construction methods and standards improved, in June of 1976, the name for trailers and mobile homes was again changed to make these portable dwellings sound more "acceptable" to "manufactured homes." These homes, like their earlier versions, are built in a factory setting on an assembly line and transported to their future location, over the highway, on their own wheels. We often see them pulled, like a trailer, behind a tractor (truck) with escort vehicles with flashing lights due to their size.

Manufactured homes periodically improve building standards including better insulated windows, more insulation in the walls and ceiling, more efficient heating systems and updated appliances as compared to prior years, in the same way that new and automobiles are constantly improving. A mobile, manufactured, or trailer home, call it what you will, is still a mobile home.



A modular home, by contrast, is a stick-built home built indoors in sections, delivered in those sections, and then assembled into the final configuration, on a permanent foundation. These homes are virtually indistinguishable from an onsite built home in design, appearance, and code requirements.

There is more flexibility in design and layout in a stick-built home, the larger the house. On the other hand, modular construction offers several major advantages over stick-built homes including:

1) Because the construction takes place indoors, in a factory setting, there are economies available in labor, logistics, materials purchasing that are passed along to buyers that are not available to stick-built home builders

2) Because the construction takes place indoors, in a factory setting, there is no exposure to the elements, inclement weather, loss through theft, that effects the materials themselves as well as cost

3) Modular homes take less time to build and occupy than a stick-built home

4) Because modular homes must withstand the rigors of being trucked over the highways, some smooth, some rough, they must be sturdier and more robust than a comparable stick-built home. This result in less movement in the home over time and better performance in severe weather *

5) The identical design in stick built vs. modular results in a lower cost finished product for modular

6) Besides the ability to build an identical look, finish, and style with a modular home to stick built, every interior detail from flooring, light fixtures, kitchens, and bathrooms, can be identical between the two

7) Widespread consumer acceptance of modular homes and the ever increasing demand for homes in general means modulars, just like stick built, have come a long way since their early days and they offer an
excellent more affordable faster option than stick built

* Some 20-plus years ago, when I was interested in learning more about modular homes, a modular company provided some remarkable photos showing the contrast. A small tornado had ripped through a new subdivision in the Pioneer Valley. Every stick built home was so badly damaged they had to be demolished and replaced new. The modular homes only sustained minimal damage like some missing roof shingles or a few sections of vinyl siding. I was immediately impressed and convinced to use that method of construction for our next home.

To sum up, there is a fundamental difference between a manufactured mobile home and either of the other two types of construction which in many respects are virtually indistinguishable, one from the other. Today, there are many variations on new home construction. For example, the innovative company Boxable offers a unique cube-like home that comes folded up. Unfold it, on site, and voila, a new home. This is a complete, 400-square foot home for $49,000 plus land and utility connections. In addition, it's easy to add more units, to the side or on top.

Paul Harsch
Williamstown, Mass.

 

 

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: We Have Great Political Leaders, Let's Keep 'em

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

We are very lucky in Berkshire County. Our political leaders are the envy of voters around the nation and respected by their peers — and because of their experience, knowledge, and seniority they get stuff done for us.

Sen. Ed Markey once again faces a challenger whose entire campaign is founded on age. As WBUR in Boston observed, Moulton is running on age, but what else? Joe Kennedy had the same platform — and Massachusetts voters rejected him.

It seems to me a candidate's age is irrelevant if he's doing the job, and Ed Markey is doing his job — very well, in fact. He's no stranger to the Berkshires, and he's fighting Trump's fascist policies every single day.
He is also the Senate author of the Green New Deal legislation.

Congressman Richie Neal is in a similar fight. I've asked friends who oppose him to name one vote he's taken they disagree with, and they cannot. Remember, the great Nancy Pelosi trusted Richie and made him chair of the powerful Ways and Means Committee, which benefits us in the Berkshires as well as the nation. Richie is a powerful advocate for Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, West-East Rail, and local investment. His opponent would be a back-bencher with zero clout.

The same arguments could — and should — be made for the rest of our Democratic contingent in Boston: Gov. Maura Healey's opponent is likely to be a Boston-centric MAGA billionaire. Do you think he cares about us? Our state Sen. Paul Mark and state Reps. John Barrett, Trish Farley-Bouvier, and Leigh Davis are all tried and true progressive Beacon Hill veterans who also know how to get stuff done. And Tara Jacobs, our representative on the Governor's Council, provides a Berkshire voice on that body that has been absent since the 1950s.

This is a nation on the brink. We have serious problems, and we need serious people to deal with them. Our Democratic contingent is made up of very serious people. That's why they all have my vote. I hope they have yours, too.

Lee Harrison
Williamstown, Mass.

 

 

View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories