Letter: Scope & Timing Wrong for New Firehouse

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

As a high-schooler in central Mass., I occasionally helped our Volunteer Fire Dept. put out grass fires caused by the railroad, so I have some understanding of what these outstanding people do for us in Williamstown. And I’m confident everyone in town appreciates and values the work of our Volunteer Fire Department.

However, the current proposal to build a $23 million firehouse here in town is another story. The problem is with both the project’s scope and timing.

Let’s first look at the timing. The economy is roaring. Unemployment is down. Inflation is up (look at the price of eggs!). Interest rates are higher than they’ve been in a decade or more and likely to climb higher (the Federal Reserve Chairman says so). Building materials prices are in the stratosphere.

And we’re still paying for our new high school, elementary school, and police station. (Note: there are quiet rumblings that we also need to build a new Town Hall!)


Contrary to popular opinion not everyone in Williamstown is a well-to-do transplant. If we want to keep seniors, the middle-class, and working families in Williamstown – and resist becoming a Hollywood caricature of a town of wealthy second- or third-home owners – at the very least we should postpone a new firehouse until interest rates and building material prices settle back to normal.

Now, the project scope: The Fire District is proposing a grand traditional brick and mortar facility with a training center, when all we really need is a utilitarian structure. For instance, Greenfield, which is four times our size, is building a new firehouse with dormitory facilities for its full-time professional fire department for a $1 million less. At the very least Williamstown should be able to think outside the box to create a structure that uses new materials and creative design to meet the needs of our volunteer department for considerably less than $23 million.

Clearly, we shouldn’t be asking Williamstown seniors, middle-class, and working families to fund a traditional project of this scale while they still shoulder the burden of constructing two schools and a police station.

In 1960, JFK's father told him he was happy to fund his campaign, "but I'll be damned if I'm going to pay for a landslide." Many of us feel the same about a new firehouse.

Lee Harrison
Williamstown, Mass.

 

 

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Voters Have Choices for Library Trustees Spots

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Just one office has a contested race in the town election on Tuesday.
 
But it is a crowded field.
 
Four candidates are on the ballot for two three-year seats on the Milne Public Library Board of Trustees.
 
The race — along with several uncontested races — will be decided when residents go to the polls from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. on Tuesday, May 12, at Williamstown Elementary School.
 
As is tradition in town, the town election will be followed one week later by the annual town meeting, also scheduled for the WES gymnasium, at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, May 19.
 
Willinet, the town's community access television station, offered the four library trustee candidates a chance to present themselves to the community in videotaped presentations available on the station and at its website, willinet.org.
 
The office sought by Janet Curran, Martin Mitsoff, Kathleen Schultze and Michael Sussman is one of seven seats on the Milne's Board of Trustees. That board is responsible for appointing the library director and deciding written policies for the library at 1095 Main St., on the Field Park rotary.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories