Letter: Comment to Dravis Article on 2022 Year in Williamstown

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

I just posted the following as a comment to Mr. Dravis' article on 2022 in Williamstown. Many in Williamstown rely on Mr. Dravis' reporting as their primary source of local news. With that influence comes responsibility.

Below are some quotes from Mr. Dravis' article. They are assertions. If Mr. Dravis has facts to support these assertions, I hope he feels responsibility to share them. The context in which the perpetrator(s) act is important. And, most of all, when investigation yields important information, that information should be given as much print as the initial posting. Sometimes investigation reveals that which seems "racist" is better called by a less judgmental term.

Why?

Once there is even a hint of racism, people, particularly those of color, are hurt. They are made to believe they are "other" in our community. Damage is done. The hurt they feel is real. If these incidents are overblown or misrepresented, people have been hurt for no good reason. A climate of uncertainty must not be encouraged.

Is DIRE, our police department, Williams College or any one keeping a factual list of who? what? when? where? And most important of all: what did an objective investigation reveal about the facts of the "racial" incident? Do we call a bias incident "racist" when the perpetrator was a "person of color?" If we have these lists, and we should, make these lists public. There are ways to share the facts without violating privacy rights. If there is a pervasive undercurrent of racism in this town, it is not seen by many and it certainly is not welcome. Let us both hear the narratives and gather facts.

Below are some of the assertions in the cited article and my comments in capital letters following.
"Hateful messages received"; 2022 had plenty of reminders why the town needs to do all the diversity work mentioned earlier."

Spell out "plenty of reminders."

"The most unsettling example came in the spring, when members of the town's Diversity, Inclusion, Race and Equity Advisory Committee received a threatening email."
 
Did we identify the perpetrator? Was this person punished or disciplined or were there "extenuating circumstances?"
 
"Throughout the year, there were reports of students in the town's schools who were harassed on racial grounds. One widely reported incident involved an adult using inappropriate language at the middle-high school."
 
How many incidents? Was there evidence of baiting the adult who used "inappropriate language?" If there was baiting, should this make a difference in the outcome for the adult?
 
"And in the fall, a spate of racially-charged incidents on the Williams College campus caught the attention of the DIRE Committee."
 
How many incidents constitute a "spate?" What was alleged? What were the outcomes?

Instead of pointing fingers, stirring up drama, and causing hurt, can we not work together to see if racism is as prevalent as some people argue. A litany of "lived experiences" is not to be discounted. Nor is a listing of microaggressions. But additional perspective is sorely needed and outcomes need to be shared with the community.

Donna Carlstrom Wied
Williamstown, Mass.

Editor: Year-end reviews are a summary of important events and issues and there are hot links to the original reporting in each case mentioned. 

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Select Board Plans Off-Camera Evaluation of Town Manager

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Select Board plans to take extraordinary measures to avoid having its discussion of the town manager's performance recorded by the town's Public, Educational and Government cameras.
 
At its Sept. 28 meeting, the board decided to hold a special meeting in a room not covered by WilliNet cameras to complete its annual evaluation process of Town Manager Robert Menicocci.
 
Chair Peter Beck said that while the evaluation is "absolutely" to be conducted in an open meeting, the board could follow a process similar to the off site, unrecorded meetings that past Select Boards have characterized as "retreats," a term not contemplated by or included in the commonwealth's Open Meeting Law.
 
The current board met on June 29 for what it characterized as a "planning session" where no formal votes were taken. That meeting was held outside of Town Hall, at the new fire station on Main Street, in a room equipped with audio and video recording equipment that the Select Board chose not to use.
 
At the Sept. 28 meeting, one board member indicated that an unrecorded meeting was preferable to discuss the annual evaluation of the one town employee supervised by the board.
 
"I'd like to do it without all the Willinet stuff," Stephanie Boyd said in a discussion toward the end of a two-hour meeting. "I think it's more conducive to conversation."
 
With the board expected to meet just once in October — its "regular" meeting date coincides with Indigenous Peoples Day on Oct. 12 — Beck suggested that the panel could find a date for a special meeting, suggesting the third Monday of the month, Oct. 19.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories