Letter: Henny Penny in Williamstown Over Marijuana Cultivation

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

Let's continue to allow outdoor marijuana cultivation in Williamstown. Vote no on a planned amendment that would ban outdoor growing. And vote yes on article 29 at the June 8 town meeting. The proposed zoning bylaw would continue to allow — but further restrict — legal cultivation. If we want to know what the impacts might be we can look back over the last four years. There has been one proposed outdoor grow operation that faced stiff opposition and legal challenges and went elsewhere. Up to two acres of cultivation has been legal in Williamstown since 2017.

I am not arguing whether marijuana is good or bad, but we're seeing a strange hypocrisy from those trying to outlaw legal cultivation. Some of the opponents are the same people who have cried out for years that regulation of land use was crippling economic development. But now they want to prevent Williamstown's current or future farmers from growing a crop that is legally available to them.

Growing up in Williamstown in the '60s and '70s I can say with authority that, like it or not, marijuana has been a major part of life here for at least half a century. It's been widely used to varying degrees by students, parents, teachers, professors, doctors, lawyers and others. Up until 2017 this widespread use was criminal. We indirectly enabled illegal trafficking and the attendant violence and devastation in Latin America and inner cities. But because we are a largely white and increasingly privileged community, we rarely suffered the consequences of decades of criminality.

In 2017 residents overwhelmingly supported legalizing recreational use of marijuana and cultivation. Now Williamstown receives close to half-a-million in tax revenue from fees from legal sales. Massachusetts dispensaries may sell only marijuana grown in Massachusetts. But suddenly the sky is falling because the Planning Board is trying to establish sensible safeguards for grow operations that may or may not be proposed in the future.

While we reap the fiscal benefits from the legal sale of recreational pot, it's only fair to allow farmers and landowners to benefit from a completely organic and legal crop. Let's not push possible impacts off on a less privileged community. Please vote no on the planned amendment that would ban outdoor cultivation. And please vote yes on Article 29, which would place sensible restrictions on an already legal farming opportunity.

Dave Simonds
Williamstown, Mass.

 

 

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Voters Have Choices for Library Trustees Spots

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Just one office has a contested race in the town election on Tuesday.
 
But it is a crowded field.
 
Four candidates are on the ballot for two three-year seats on the Milne Public Library Board of Trustees.
 
The race — along with several uncontested races — will be decided when residents go to the polls from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. on Tuesday, May 12, at Williamstown Elementary School.
 
As is tradition in town, the town election will be followed one week later by the annual town meeting, also scheduled for the WES gymnasium, at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, May 19.
 
Willinet, the town's community access television station, offered the four library trustee candidates a chance to present themselves to the community in videotaped presentations available on the station and at its website, willinet.org.
 
The office sought by Janet Curran, Martin Mitsoff, Kathleen Schultze and Michael Sussman is one of seven seats on the Milne's Board of Trustees. That board is responsible for appointing the library director and deciding written policies for the library at 1095 Main St., on the Field Park rotary.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories